deregister BESM-2-9 source_id entry

[durack1]

From: "Durack, Paul J." Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 10:44 AM To: "andre.lanfer@inpe", "nobrepaulo@gmail", "paulo.nobre@inpe" Subject: Re: CMIP6 data licensing update

Hello again gents, just looping around. I assume you are both busy with post-CMIP6 projects.

We have managed to work through several the loose ends and have now deregistered 7 of the 11 remaining unpublished models.

To finish up this cleanup, I plan to deregister BESM-2-9 next week (Thursday 30th June 2022) unless I hear back from you.

Cheers,

P

From: "Durack, Paul J." Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 7:33 PM To: "andre.lanfer@inpe", "nobrepaulo@gmail", "paulo.nobre@inpe" Subject: Re: CMIP6 data licensing update

Hi gents, I hope all is well in Brazil and you are negotiating your new normal well.

Just circling around on the query below. The BESM-2-9 model is one of the registered entries with no currently published data (e.g. https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/?source_id=BESM-2-9). Additionally, this was omitted in the AR6 Annex II (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_AnnexII.pdf#Page=15), and so for both these reasons will not be included in the IPCC DDC AR6 data archive.

We are curious about the status of your contribution, and whether we should deregister the entry if no data is planned for publication.

Cheers,

P

@matthew-mizielinski @MartinaST ping

[durack1]

ping @andrelanfer @@besm-inpe

This will also lead to deregistration of institution_id = INPE

[durack1]

@andrelanfer, @besm-inpe those changes are now in place, with both CMIP6_institution_id.html and CMIP6_source_id.html updated