search

WCRP-CMIP / CMIP6_CVs

Controlled Vocabularies (CVs) for use in CMIP6
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
149 stars 76 forks source link

source_id registration of GISS-E2.1G/GISS-E2.1H #177

Closed gavinny closed 3 months ago

gavinny commented 7 years ago

"GISS-E2.1G":{ aerosol = varies with physics-version. p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX ) atmosphere = GISS-E2.1(90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa)
atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version. p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1G label_extended = GISS-E2.1G land_ice = Fixed land_surface = GISS LSM
ocean = GISS Ocean (1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 10m)
ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016 sea_ice = GISS SI source_id = GISS-E2.1G }

"GISS-E2.1H":{ aerosol = varies with physics-version. p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX ) atmosphere = GISS-E2.1(90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa)
atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version. p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1H label_extended = GISS-E2.1H land_ice = Fixed land_surface = GISS LSM
ocean = HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid; ~1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)
ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016 sea_ice = GISS SI source_id = GISS-E2.1H }

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny thanks for submitting, we're limiting the source_id keys to the values a-z, A-Z, 0-9, and "-" (as these will be part of the DRS directory structure generated by CMOR), so how do you like the following amendments? I've also added some queries (applicable to both models) using the #question notation (it would be good to gather these additional details, or clarify the query).

Also wondering if you're happy with the existing institution_id registration?

"GISS-E2-1G":{

aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX) #Should there be an entry for p==3?

atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa)
atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)
institution_id = NASA-GISS
label = GISS-E2.1G
label_extended = GISS-E2.1G
land_ice = Fixed

land_surface = GISS LSM #Is there a version number?

ocean = GISS Ocean (1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m) #Is there a version number?

ocean_biogeochemistry = None
release_year = 2016

sea_ice = GISS SI #Is there a version number?

source_id = GISS-E2-1G
}

"GISS-E2-1H":{
aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX)
atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa)
atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)
institution_id = NASA-GISS
label = GISS-E2.1H
label_extended = GISS-E2.1H
land_ice = Fixed
land_surface = GISS LSM
ocean = HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid; ~1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)
ocean_biogeochemistry = None
release_year = 2016
sea_ice = GISS SI
source_id = GISS-E2-1H
}
gavinny commented 7 years ago

this is better:

"GISS-E2-1-G”:{ aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX) atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa) atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI) institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1G label_extended = GISS-E2.1G land_ice = Fixed land_surface = GISS LSM #Is there a version number? ocean = GISS Ocean (1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 10m) #Is there a version number? ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016 sea_ice = GISS SI source_id = GISS-E2-1-G }

Notes: p==2 is the one that should be missing - that was an intermediate version we used in CMIP5 but have discontinued). No version numbers for sea ice or LSM since they really aren’t distinct - we are only naming them for this.

"GISS-E2-1-H":{ aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX) atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa) atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI) institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1H label_extended = GISS-E2.1H land_ice = Fixed land_surface = GISS LSM ocean = HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid; ~1 deg latitude/longitude; 26 levels; top grid cell 0-10m) ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016 sea_ice = GISS SI source_id = GISS-E2-1-H }

thanks

Gavin

==========

Gavin Schmidt Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway New York, NY 10025 Tel: 212 678 5627 Email: Gavin.A.Schmidt@nasa.govmailto:Gavin.A.Schmidt@nasa.gov URL: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt.html

On Dec 8, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

@gavinnyhttps://github.com/gavinny thanks for submitting, we're limiting the source_id keys to the values a-z, A-Z, 0-9, and "-", as these will be part of the DRS directory structure generated by CMOR so how do you like the following amendments? I've also added some queries (applicable to both models) using the #question notation (it would be good to gather these additional details, or clarify the query).

Also wondering if you're happy with the existing institution_id registrationhttps://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/blob/master/CMIP6_institution_id.json#L21?

"GISS-E2-1G":{

aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX) #Should there be an entry for p==3?

atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa) atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI) institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1G label_extended = GISS-E2.1G land_ice = Fixed

land_surface = GISS LSM #Is there a version number?

ocean = GISS Ocean (1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 10m) #Is there a version number?

ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016

sea_ice = GISS SI #Is there a version number?

source_id = GISS-E2-1G }

"GISS-E2-1H":{ aerosol = varies with physics-version (p==1 None, p==2 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX) atmosphere = GISS-E2.1 (90 x 144 2x2.5; 40 levels; top level 0.1hPa) atmospheric_chemistry = varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI) institution_id = NASA-GISS label = GISS-E2.1H label_extended = GISS-E2.1H land_ice = Fixed land_surface = GISS LSM ocean = HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid; ~1 deg latitude/longitude; 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m) ocean_biogeochemistry = None release_year = 2016 sea_ice = GISS SI source_id = GISS-E2-1H }

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-265875049, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXADldYP7aP3IbY2-TY-tHhCD37XJks5rGISTgaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny take a peek at CMIP6_source_id.html and check the entries.. We can continue to tweak these until you start publishing..

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny we have recently augmented the information we are collecting for registration, so we require some additional information from you (specifically the nominal_resolution attribute for each realm). I have made some amendments to the existing entries below (noted between the ### entry ### text), and will require you to fill out the fields with the ### informational text directing you to descriptive information about the request, or lists of potential entries (I have only included this for the first model GISS-E2-1G as an example)

"GISS-E2-1G":{
   "activity_participation":[
      "" ### See activity list at https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/blob/master/CMIP6_activity_id.json
   ],
"model_component":
"aerosol":
   "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 none, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX)",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos below)
"atmos":
   "description":"GISS-E2.1 (###2 x 2.5 degrees; 144 x 90 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top level 0.1 hPa###)",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl
"atmosChem":
   "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above)
"land":
   "description":"GISS LSM",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above)
"landIce":
   "description":"Fixed",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above)
"ocean":
   "description":"GISS Ocean (1 deg###; 360 x 180 longitude/latitude;### 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl
"seaIce":
   "description":"GISS SI",
   "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as ocean above)

"GISS-E2-1H":{
   "activity_participation":[
      ""
   ],
"model_component":
"aerosol":
   "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 none, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX)",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"atmos":
   "description":"GISS-E2.1 (###2 x 2.5 degrees; 144 x 90 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top level 0.1 hPa###)",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"atmosChem":
   "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"land":
   "description":"GISS LSM",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"landIce":
   "description":"Fixed",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"ocean":
   "description":"HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid;### 360 x 180 longitude/latitude###; 26 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)",
   "nominal_resolution":""
"seaIce":
   "description":"GISS SI",
   "nominal_resolution":""
durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny have you had any luck collecting the information requested above?

gavinny commented 7 years ago

Sorry - haven't got around to it yet.

Gavin

Gavin A. Schmidt NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway, New York Tel: 212 678 5627<tel:212%20677%205627> Email: gavin.a.schmidt@nasa.govmailto:gavin.a.schmidt@nasa.gov URL: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt.html

On May 10, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

@gavinnyhttps://github.com/gavinny have you had any luck collecting the information requested above?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-300589674, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXIcbi9h1IspcfuJ2K_iC0pniNyK1ks5r4hF7gaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny no problem, when you get it together please update this issue, I'll pull the info across and close it out

davidhassell commented 7 years ago

Hello,

My name is David Hassell and I am part of the ES-DOC team that is working on CMIP6 documentation. As a part of this process, we need a liaison at NASA-GISS who can act as the interface between the scientists who actually provide the documentation and the ES-DOC team. I was wondering if you are able to help with identifying such a person?

The documentation process has changed considerably since CMIP5 (in response to the feedback that we received), and you can now choose from a variety of documentation methods. Our aim is to train the ES-DOC liaison who can then work with people at NASA-GISS. No specialist knowledge about ES-DOC nor climate modelling is required, but neither would it be a problem, of course. Some institutes have appointed a member of the modelling team, others not.

I would be very grateful f you could let me know by e-mail (david.hassell at ncas.ac.uk) if you have any suggestions.

All the best,

David Hassell

National Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Reading UK

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny have you had any luck collecting that additional info?

gavinny commented 7 years ago

Hi Paul,

1) ‘activity-participation’ is not a good field to be set in the documentation, since it will vary as a function of time. If we set it optimistically, we mislead people if the activity doesn’t happen (for whatever reason), if we set it conservatively, people will not find appropriate runs that do end up being done. Thus we will prefer to leave this blank (or to be filled in via some interactive search).

2) “nominal_resolution" for atmos is “250km”, for ocean in GISS-E2.1G is “100km”, for ocean in GISS-E2.1H it is “100km” also.

3) “nominal_resolution” for aerosol/atmosChem/land/landIce/seaIce are all as for atmos, only ocean is different.

Gavin

==========

Gavin Schmidt Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway New York, NY 10025 Tel: 212 678 5627 Email: Gavin.A.Schmidt@nasa.gov URL: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt.html

On Apr 26, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com wrote:

@gavinny https://github.com/gavinny we have recently augmented the information we are collecting for registration, so we require some additional information from you (specifically the nominal_resolution attribute for each realm). I have made some amendments to the existing entries below (noted between the ### entry ### text), and will require you to fill out the fields with the ### informational text directing you to descriptive information about the request, or lists of potential entries (I have only included this for the first model GISS-E2-1G as an example)

"GISS-E2-1G":{ "activity_participation":[ "" ### See activity list at https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/blob/master/CMIP6_activity_id.json ], "model_component": "aerosol": "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 none, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX)", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos below) "atmos": "description":"GISS-E2.1 (###2 x 2.5 degrees; 144 x 90 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top level 0.1 hPa###)", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl "atmosChem": "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above) "land": "description":"GISS LSM", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above) "landIce": "description":"Fixed", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as atmos above) "ocean": "description":"GISS Ocean (1 deg###; 360 x 180 longitude/latitude;### 32 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl "seaIce": "description":"GISS SI", "nominal_resolution":"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl (likely same as ocean above)

"GISS-E2-1H":{ "activity_participation":[ "" ], "model_component": "aerosol": "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 none, p==3 OMA, p==4 TOMAS, p==5 MATRIX)", "nominal_resolution":"" "atmos": "description":"GISS-E2.1 (###2 x 2.5 degrees; 144 x 90 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top level 0.1 hPa###)", "nominal_resolution":"" "atmosChem": "description":"varies with physics-version (p==1 Non-interactive, p>1 GPUCCINI)", "nominal_resolution":"" "land": "description":"GISS LSM", "nominal_resolution":"" "landIce": "description":"Fixed", "nominal_resolution":"" "ocean": "description":"HYCOM Ocean (tripolar grid;### 360 x 180 longitude/latitude###; 26 levels; top grid cell 0-10m)", "nominal_resolution":"" "seaIce": "description":"GISS SI", "nominal_resolution":"" — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-297461410, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXNif2Cv12m5s2fHWs1XjQimV5oTqks5rz2xEgaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny thanks for this, peek at CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if any further tweaks are required. As I have noted earlier these entries can be amended up to the point that you start writing data, if you are using CMOR, selected entries from this registration will be written as global attributes in your CMOR-written files.

I have added CMIP as the sole activity_participation as we require an entry for this field. The entry is being used as a MIP interest registry, I note that Anthony Leboissetier has also registered on the CMIP6-OMIP mailing list, so we could potentially add OMIP (along with any other MIP entries) to the list if there is the interest - if you check the CMIP6_source_id.html page, you'll see the "interest" noted by the other contributing (and registered) models.

I also set your seaIce nominal_resolution values to the same as the ocean grid, I am guessing that these are identical, rather than being on the atmos grid - if I am wrong let me know and I will amend (along with anything else that I have wrong - possibly also the 360 x 180 longitude/latitude values for the ocean components).

gavinny commented 7 years ago

Thanks.

I also set your seaIce nominal_resolution values to the same as the ocean grid, I am guessing that these are identical, rather than being on the atmos grid - if I am wrong let me know and I will amend (along with anything else that I have wrong - possibly also the 360 x 180 longitude/latitude values for the ocean components).

No, the sea ice is actually on the atmospheric grid in these configurations. I’ll check with the ocean folks on the size of the arrays.

Gavin

==========

Gavin Schmidt Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway New York, NY 10025 Tel: 212 678 5627 Email: Gavin.A.Schmidt@nasa.gov URL: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt.html

On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com wrote:

@gavinny https://github.com/gavinny thanks for this, peek at CMIP6_source_id.html http://rawgit.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/master/src/CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if any further tweaks are required. As I have noted earlier these entries can be amended up to the point that you start writing data, if you are using CMOR, the entries from this registration will be written as global attributes in your CMOR-written files.

I have added CMIP as the sole activity_participation as we require an entry for this field. The entry is being used as a MIP interest registry, I note that Anthony Leboissetier has also registered on the CMIP6-OMIP mailing list, so we could potentially add OMIP (along with any other MIP entries) to the list if there is the interest - if you check the CMIP6_source_id.html http://rawgit.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/master/src/CMIP6_source_id.html page, you'll see the "interest" noted by the other contributing (and registered) models.

I also set your seaIce nominal_resolution values to the same as the ocean grid, I am guessing that these are identical, rather than being on the atmos grid - if I am wrong let me know and I will amend (along with anything else that I have wrong - possibly also the 360 x 180 longitude/latitude values for the ocean components).

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-308832491, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXMO6d6NuKFoq91GfuEsNDUlJ-dKMks5sEXtrgaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 7 years ago

@gavinny, no problem will change the seaIce.. Let me know if further tweaks to ocean array sizes are also required..

jypeter commented 6 years ago

@gavinny don't forget to ask @durack1 to add PMIPto the activity participationfield of GISS-E2-1G. Unless that's a problem, as I have read some arguments about this above. But I find it really useful to go to the models' CV page and get all the models involved in PMIP4, when I search for "PMIP"

You should also add a list of the other MIPs your group will be involved in. Same thing for the GISS-E2-1H model

I'm also wondering about the atmos resol. I have read in the discussion above "144 x 90 longitude/latitude", but in the official CMIP6 source_id values I find "90 x 144 longitude/latitude;". Which one is correct?

gavinny commented 6 years ago

It should be 144 longitude/90 latitude. I’ll try and get it fixed

Gavin A. Schmidt NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway, New York Tel: 212 678 5627<tel:212%20677%205627> Email: gavin.a.schmidt@nasa.govmailto:gavin.a.schmidt@nasa.gov URL: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt.html

On Mar 30, 2018, at 8:42 AM, Jean-Yves Peterschmitt notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

@gavinnyhttps://github.com/gavinny don't forget to ask @durack1https://github.com/durack1 to add PMIPto the activity participationfield of GISS-E2-1G. Unless that's a problem, as I have read some arguments about this above. But I find it really useful to go to the models' CV page and get all the models involved in PMIP4, when I search for "PMIP"

You should also add a list of the other MIPs your group will be involved in. Same thing for the GISS-E2-1H model

I'm also wondering about the atmos resol. I have read in the discussion above "144 x 90 longitude/latitude", but in the official CMIP6 source_id valueshttps://rawgit.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/master/src/CMIP6_source_id.html I find "90 x 144 longitude/latitude;". Which one is correct?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-377516435, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXCdPGTdeuO_agAed5AhEkc-emLFYks5tjigogaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 6 years ago

@jypeter @gavinny reopening this, as there are details to clarify and update

gavinny commented 6 years ago

Hi Paul, the text in https://rawgit.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/master/src/CMIP6_source_id.html for "atoms" is incorrect. It should be

GISS-E2.1 (2x2.5 degree; 90 x 144 latitude/longitude; 40 levels; top level 0.1 hPa)

Secondly, my request for the model names above wasn't accepted for some reason. But can I insist that it be changed? I would prefer:

GISS-E2-1-G and GISS-E2-1-H

(w/additional hyphens).

Additionally, can we register the following two model names as well:

GISS-E2-1-MA-G and GISS-E3-G

Thanks

Gavin

gavinny commented 6 years ago

Additionally, should "activity participation" include all MIPs we are going to be involved in? (That is a long list, and I'm not seeing any of the other models listing all of them).

Thanks

Gavin

durack1 commented 6 years ago

@gavinny no problem, will get onto some amendments today. All MIPs that you're participating should be included in your activity_participation field, so if you have additions - the complete list can be viewed at CMIP6_activity_id.json

gavinny commented 6 years ago

Ok. Please add the following list to GISS-E2-1-G: "AerChemMIP","C4MIP","CFMIP","CMIP","DAMIP","DynVarMIP","FAFMIP","GMMIP","ISMIP6","LS3MIP","LUMIP","OMIP","PAMIP","PMIP","RFMIP","SIMIP","ScenarioMIP","VIACSAB","VolMIP"

Add the following to GISS-E2-1-H: "CMIP","SIMIP","ScenarioMIP","OMIP","PAMIP"

This may be updated later.

Thanks

jypeter commented 6 years ago

Thanks @gavinny ! From my point of view, it's quite convenient to be able to search PMIP in the CV, and get all the models that will be involved in PMIP. I even found out that way that 2 new groups are interested in PMIP (I had heard about them, but there was nothing official)

Is GISS-E3-Gthe second model listed as GISS-E3-R on the PMIP site?

durack1 commented 6 years ago

@gavinny this is a little complex so I will break it down into parts:

gavinny commented 6 years ago

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/177#issuecomment-378435738, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXVEXDjVR1Ri4vRthDu3GSt7GLkUPotLks5tlAvGgaJpZM4LIPoc.

durack1 commented 6 years ago

@gavinny those changes are now in place, take a peek at CMIP6_source_id.html to cross check the updates.

Please open a new issue(s) for the registration of GISS-E2-1-MA-G and GISS-E3-G.

durack1 commented 4 months ago

@gavinny, similar to https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/1018 GISS-E2-1-H ['r1i1p1f1'] also has 33 vertical levels in the output, whereas the reporting above says 32 - another typo to fix? If yes, did you want to reopen this and I'll make the tweak

durack1 commented 3 months ago

Yes, both instances. Thanks … -- Gavin A. Schmidt Director, Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway, New York NY 10025 Cell: 212 749 0006 Email: @.**@.> URL: https://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt From: Paul J. Durack @.> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 4:51 PM To: WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs @.> Cc: Schmidt, Gavin A. (GISS-6110) @.>, Mention @.> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: [WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs] Add GISS-E2.2H as a model (#1018) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC. @gavinnyhttps://github.com/gavinny yep over to me for tweaks, BUT, it would be useful for me to know whether the same issue should be fixed for GISS-E2-1-H ['r1i1p1f1'] as well? (this issue is focused on GISS-E2-2-H ['r1i1p1f1']) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1018 (comment)>, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF2UIXGFUHBUGJZMPMOQ26DY2R7DVAVCNFSM43XJ7S7KU5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TEMBSGYYDSMJZGYYQ. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Reopening

durack1 commented 3 months ago

@gavinny GISS-E2-1-H updated to reflect 33 (and not 32) vertical ocean levels, see CMIP6_source_id.html - similar to #1018