Closed durack1 closed 7 years ago
Dear Dr. Durack,
We are very sorry for the late response! We have filled the items between @ sysbols, as
"MIROC6":{ "aerosol":"SPRINTARS6.0", "atmosphere":"CCSR AGCM (T85; 256x128; 81 levels; top level 0.004 hPa)", "atmospheric_chemistry":"None", "cohort":[ "" ], "institution_id":[ "MIROC" ], "label":"MIROC6", "label_extended":"MIROC6", "land_ice":"None", "land_surface":"MATSIRO6.0", "ocean":"COCO4.9 (360x256x63; tripolar primarily 1deg; 63 levels; top grid cell 0-2 m)", "ocean_biogeochemistry":"None", "release_year":"2017", "sea_ice":"COCO4.9", "source_id":"MIROC6" },
Soon, we will submit the other source_id of institution_id "MIROC".
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Hiroaki Tatebe
2017-02-22 2:27 GMT+09:00 Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com:
@tatebeJAMSTEC please review and provide values for the items indicated between @ symbols
"MIROC6":{ "aerosol":"SPRINTARS @VERSION INFO?@", "atmosphere":"CCSR AGCM (T85; @XXX x XXX longitude/latitude@; 81
levels; top level 0.004 hPa)", "atmospheric_chemistry":"None", "cohort":[ "" ], "institution_id":[ "MIROC" ], "label":"MIROC6", "label_extended":"MIROC6", "land_ice":"None", "land_surface":"MATSIRO @VERSION INFO?@", "ocean":"COCO4.9 (360x256x63; tripolar primarily 1deg; 63 levels; top grid cell 0-2 m)", "ocean_biogeochemistry":"None", "release_year":"2017", "sea_ice":"COCO4.9", "source_id":"MIROC6" },
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@tatebeJAMSTEC take a look at CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if any further edits are required
@tatebeJAMSTEC we have augmented the fields that we are capturing in our source_id
registrations. Can you please add in the activity_participation
and nominal_resolution
fields missing in your MIROC6
registration - there are some guidance notes for completing these fields found in Model_registration_template.md.
We will also need the same information for MIROC-ES2H
, MIROC-ES2L
, NICAM16-7S
, NICAM16-8S
, NICAM16-9D-L78
and NICAM16-9S
@tatebeJAMSTEC we have augmented the fields that we are capturing in our source_id
registrations. Can you please add in the activity_participation
and nominal_resolution
fields missing in your MIROC6
registration - there are some guidance notes for completing these fields found in Model_registration_template.md.
We will also need the same information for MIROC-ES2H
, MIROC-ES2L
, NICAM16-7S
, NICAM16-8S
, NICAM16-9D-L78
and NICAM16-9S
@tatebeJAMSTEC I am curious if you have been able to review the open query above. I wonder are you the appropriate contact to resolve these issues? If not, can you please redirect this query to the appropriate contact?
@tatebeJAMSTEC thanks for the #384 pull request. We have a controlled vocabulary for the nominal_resolution
values so I had to amend your suggested changes to agree with these. The final changes are listed in #385, please take a look at CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if any further edits are required
@tatebeJAMSTEC we have amended the activity_participation
entry for NICAM16-7S
, NICAM16-8S
, NICAM16-9D-L78
, and NICAM16-9S
to include CMIP
, as this experiment suite (piControl
etc) is a required component of contributing to the CMIP6 project
For reference this change was made in WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs#475
@tatebeJAMSTEC please review and provide values for the items indicated between @XXX@ symbols