Closed ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL closed 7 years ago
@areappu did you intend to close this?
We need a fair bit more information to successfully register a model, an example is below (you can see all registered models at CMIP6_source_id.json):
"EMAC-2-53-Vol":{
"aerosol":"gmxe 2.2.x",
"atmosphere":"ECHAM5.3.2 (modified; spectral T42; 128 x 64 longitude/latitude; 90 levels; top level 0.001 hPa)",
"atmospheric_chemistry":"MECCA 3.8.x",
"cohort":[
"Registered"
],
"institution_id":[
"MESSy-Consortium"
],
"label":"EMAC-2-53-Vol",
"label_extended":"EMAC-2-53-x-Vol",
"land_ice":"None",
"land_surface":"same as Atmosphere",
"ocean":"MPIOM 1.3.0-beta (bipolar GR1.5; approximately 1.5deg reducing toward the poles, 256 x 220 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; top grid cell 0-12 m)",
"ocean_biogeochemistry":"None",
"release_year":"2017",
"sea_ice":"thermodynamic (Semtner zero-layer) dynamic (Hibler 79) sea ice model",
"source_id":"EMAC-2-53-Vol"
},
Hi Paul, Yes. I intended to close it. I will reopen with more info next week. Thanks,
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL apologies for the delayed reply, however we need some additional information from you. We are centralizing additional information activity_participation
, nominal_resolution_atmos
, nominal_resolution_landIce
and nominal_resolution_ocean
. I have amended your entries above with placeholder ### TEXT ###
above. If any of these details are uncertain we can keep them as the ?-?
values that you had originally included
Hi Paul, let's keep it as ?-? for now and I'll get back with more details soon. Just getting back to my emails after a vacation. Thank you.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:57 PM Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com wrote:
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL https://github.com/ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL apologies for the delayed reply, however we need some additional information from you. We are centralizing additional information activity_participation, nominal_resolution_atmos, nominal_resolution_landIce and nominal_resolution_ocean. I have amended your entries above with placeholder ### TEXT ### above. If any of these details are uncertain we can keep them as the ?-? values that you had originally included
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/244#issuecomment-287895424, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFUgRm7ff9mztV-r24P4G2m7B9j_eLcYks5rnuglgaJpZM4MYkPX .
-- Aparna
"GFDL-ESM4":{
"activity_participation":[
AerChemMIP
C4MIP
ScenarioMIP
DAMIP
CFMIP
DynVar
GMMIP
LUMIP
RFMIP
OMIP
GMMIP
CMIP ],
"aerosol" : "### ?? ###",
"atmosphere":"GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, 360x180 longitude/latitude; 48 levels, model top: 1Pa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "GFDL-ATMCHEM4.1 (full atmospheric chemistry)”,
"institution_id" : "NOAA-GFDL”,
"label" : "GFDL-ESM4” ,
"label_extended" :"GFDL-ESM4”,
"land_ice" : "GFDL-LM4.1”,
"land_surface" : "GFDL-LM4.1”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
"?"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
“50km"
],
"ocean": "GFDL-MOM6 (tripolar - nominal 0.5 deg; 720x360 longitude/latitude; 50 levels; top grid cell ###?-?### m) "
"ocean_biogeochemistry": " COBALT 2.0”,
"release_year" : “2017",
"sea_ice" : “SIS2",
"source_id ": "GFDL-ESM4”,
},
"GFDL-CM4":{
"activity_participation":[
“CMIP, OMIP"
],
"aerosol" : "### ?? ###",
"atmosphere" : "GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution;360x180 longitude/latitude; 32 levels; model top: 1hPa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "unnamed (fast chemistry, aerosol only)",
“institution_id":"NOAA-GFDL”,
“label”:"GFDL-CM4”,
“label_extended”:"GFDL-CM4”,
“land_ice”:"GFDL-LM4.0”,
“land_surface”:"GFDL-LM4.0”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
“?"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
“25km"
],
“ocean”:"GFDL-MOM6 (tripolar - nominal 0.25 deg latitude/longitude;1440x720 longitude/latitude; 50 levels; top grid cell ###?-?### m)”,
“ocean_biogeochemistry”:”none”,
"release_year" : "2017”,
“sea_ice”:”SIS2”,
"source_id:"GFDL-CM4”
}
"GFDL-AM4":{
"activity_participation": [
“CMIP"
],
"aerosol": "### ?? ###”,
"atmosphere": "GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, 360x180 longitude/latitude; 32 levels; model top: 1 hPa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "### ?? ###”,
"cohort":[
"Registered"
],
"institution_id": "NOAA-GFDL”,
"label": "GFDL-AM4.0” ,
"label_extended": "GFDL-AM4.0”,
"land_ice": "None”,
"land_surface": "None”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos": [
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
"None"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
"None"
],
"ocean": "None"
"ocean_biogeochemistry": "None”,
"release_year": “2017",
"sea_ice": “None,
"source_id": "GFDL-AM4”,
}
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL thanks for this, if I'm following correctly, GFDL-AM4
is a third model that you want to register (in addition to GFDL-CM4
and GFDL-ESM4
). is this correct?
Below you've missed a couple of fields, added in with ### SOMETEXT ###
. There are also some fields in the comment above that also require inclusion so that we can register GFDL-CM4
and GFDL-ESM4
- please edit the entry above to finalize these:
"GFDL-AM4":{
"activity_participation": [
"" ### See activity list at https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/blob/master/CMIP6_activity_id.json ###
],
"aerosol": "### ?? ###”,
"atmosphere": "GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, ### 360x180 longitude/latitude###; 32 levels; model top: 1 hPa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "### ?? ###”,
"cohort":[
"Registered"
],
"institution_id": "NOAA-GFDL”,
"label": "GFDL-AM4.0” ,
"label_extended": "GFDL-AM4.0”,
"land_ice": "None”,
"land_surface": "None”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos": [
"" ### See Appendix 2 in https://goo.gl/v1drZl ###
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
"None"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
"None"
],
"ocean": "None"
"ocean_biogeochemistry": "None”,
"release_year": “2017",
"sea_ice": “None,
"source_id": "GFDL-AM4”,
},
Hi Paul, I've updated the model CV. Please let me know if there is anything else. I will also fill in the blanks and validate the info I provided in the background and keep you posted should there be a newer version. Thanks,
@aradhakrishnanGFDL great, did you want to remove the additional ###
strings in the 3 entries in the comment above
So e.g. "atmosphere":"GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, ### 360x180 longitude/latitude###; 48 levels, model top: 1 Pa)”,
Yes, sure.
Are the suggested values between them correct? I just guessed for the placeholders
I've edited the comments. But, I am checking on the nominal resolution and a couple of ocean metadata. I'll keep you posted. Thanks,
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL great, well let me know through a new comment on this thread when the details contained in the comment above are ready for merging and we can close this issue
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL also the "aerosol": "### ?? ###”,
entries are also unfilled.. For the CMIP5 contributing model GFDL-CM3
this was listed as "interactive"
or for many of the other GFDL models "semi-interactive"
checking..checking..almost there
"GFDL-ESM4":{
"activity_participation":[
AerChemMIP
C4MIP
ScenarioMIP
DAMIP
CFMIP
DynVar
GMMIP
LUMIP
RFMIP
OMIP
GMMIP
CMIP ],
"aerosol" : interactive",
"atmosphere":"GFDL-AM4.1 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, 360x180 longitude/latitude; 48 levels, model top: 1Pa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "GFDL-ATMCHEM4.1 (full atmospheric chemistry)”,
"institution_id" : "NOAA-GFDL”,
"label" : "GFDL-ESM4” ,
"label_extended" :"GFDL-ESM4”,
"land_ice" : "GFDL-LM4.1”,
"land_surface" : "GFDL-LM4.1”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
“50km"
],
"ocean": "GFDL-MOM6 (tripolar - nominal 0.5 deg; 720x360 longitude/latitude; 75 levels; top grid cell 2m) "
"ocean_biogeochemistry": " COBALT 2.0”,
"release_year" : “2017",
"sea_ice" : “SIS2",
"source_id ": "GFDL-ESM4”,
},
"GFDL-CM4":{
"activity_participation":[
“CMIP, OMIP"
],
"aerosol" : “interactive",
"atmosphere" : "GFDL-AM4.1 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution;360x180 longitude/latitude; 32 levels; model top: 1hPa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "unnamed (fast chemistry, aerosol only)",
“institution_id":"NOAA-GFDL”,
“label”:"GFDL-CM4”,
“label_extended”:"GFDL-CM4”,
“land_ice”:"GFDL-LM4.0”,
“land_surface”:"GFDL-LM4.0”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
“25km"
],
“ocean”:"GFDL-MOM6 (tripolar - nominal 0.25 deg latitude/longitude;1440x720 longitude/latitude; 75 levels; top grid cell 2m)”,
“ocean_biogeochemistry”:”none”,
"release_year" : "2017”,
“sea_ice”:”SIS2”,
"source_id:"GFDL-CM4”
}
"GFDL-AM4":{
"activity_participation": [
“CMIP"
],
"aerosol": “interactive”,
"atmosphere": "GFDL-AM4.0 (Cubed-sphere (c96) - 1 degree nominal horizontal resolution, 360x180 longitude/latitude; 32 levels; model top: 1 hPa)”,
"atmospheric_chemistry": "fast chemistry, aerosol only”,
"cohort":[
"Registered"
],
"institution_id": "NOAA-GFDL”,
"label": "GFDL-AM4.0” ,
"label_extended": "GFDL-AM4.0”,
"land_ice": "GFDL-LM4.0”,
"land_surface": "GFDL-LM4.0”,
"nominal_resolution_atmos": [
“100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_landIce":[
"100km"
],
"nominal_resolution_ocean":[
"None"
],
"ocean": "None"
"ocean_biogeochemistry": "None”,
"release_year": “2017",
"sea_ice": “None,
"source_id": "GFDL-AM4.0”,
}
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL great, I'll pull these across.. Just to clarify, the ocean top grid cell is 0-2 m reported at 1 m right?
@ARadhakrishnanAtGFDL these are now merged, please take one last look at the registered entries by browsing CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if there are any other tweaks required..
Thanks for pushing through to get this completed..