source_id registration of INM-CM5-0

[volodin1]

model description is complete

[volodin1]

label = INMCM50 label_extended = INMCM50 source_id = INMCM50 institution_id = INM release_year = 2016 activity_participation = [CMIP]

aerosol: description = INMAER1 nominal_resolution = 150km atmos: description = INMAM50 (2x1.5, 180x120 longitude/latitude; 73 levels; top level sigma=0.0002) nominal_resolution = 150 km atmosChem: description = none nominal_resolution = none land: description = INMLND1 nominal_resolution = 150 km
landIce: description = none nominal_resolution = none ocean: description = INMOM5 (North Pole shifted to 60N, 90E. 0.5x0.25; 720 x 720 longitude/latitude; 40 levels; vertical sigma coordinate) nominal_resolution = 40 km ocnBgchem: description = none nominal_resolution = none seaIce: description = INMICE1 nominal_resolution = 40km

[durack1]

@volodin1 our currently registered model names are:

[u'ACCESS-1-0',
 u'AWI-CM-1-0-HR',
 u'AWI-CM-1-0-LR',
 u'AWI-CM-1-0-MR',
 u'BESM-2-7',
 u'BNU-ESM-1-1',
 u'CAMS_CSM1-0',
 u'CIESM',
 u'CMCC-CM2-HR4',
 u'CMCC-CM2-HR5',
 u'CMCC-CM2-SR5',
 u'CMCC-CM2-VHR4',
 u'CMCC-ESM2-HR5',
 u'CMCC-ESM2-SR5',
 u'CNRM-CM6-1',
 u'CNRM-CM6-1-HR',
 u'CNRM-ESM2-1',
 u'CNRM-ESM2-1-HR',
 u'CanESM5',
 u'EC-Earth3',
 u'EC-Earth3-AerChem',
 u'EC-Earth3-CC',
 u'EC-Earth3-GrIS',
 u'EC-Earth3-HR',
 u'EC-Earth3-LR',
 u'EC-Earth3-Veg',
 u'EC-Earth3-Veg-LR',
 u'EMAC-2-53-AerChem',
 u'EMAC-2-53-Vol',
 u'GFDL-AM4',
 u'GFDL-CM4',
 u'GFDL-ESM4',
 u'GISS-E2-1G',
 u'GISS-E2-1H',
 u'HadGEM3-GC31-HH',
 u'HadGEM3-GC31-HM',
 u'HadGEM3-GC31-LL',
 u'HadGEM3-GC31-MM',
 u'IITM-ESM',
 u'MIROC-ES2H',
 u'MIROC-ES2L',
 u'MIROC6',
 u'MPIESM-1-2-HR',
 u'MPIESM-1-2-LR',
 u'MPIESM-2-LR',
 u'MRI-ESM2-0',
 u'NICAM16-7S',
 u'NICAM16-8S',
 u'NICAM16-9D-L78',
 u'NICAM16-9S',
 u'NorESM2-HH',
 u'NorESM2-LM',
 u'NorESM2-LME',
 u'NorESM2-LMEC',
 u'NorESM2-MH',
 u'NorESM2-MM',
 u'PCMDI-test-1-0',
 u'UKESM1-0-LL',
 u'UKESM1-0-MMh',
 u'VRESM-1-0']

Would you consider the registration of INM-CM5-0 to bring this closer to the similar format of existing entries?

[volodin1]

Dear Paul, Model name was changed from INMCM50 to INM-CM5-0, and must I also change other attributes (label, label_extended, ...) or change of model name is enough? Similar question about INM-CM4-8

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Paul J. Durack notifications@github.com wrote:

Reopened #358 https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/358.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/358#event-1129973251, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcLaeg2p8VmkeD0jvsYdLrrzsLEwNpynks5sFu5JgaJpZM4N-aj- .

[durack1]

@volodin1 up to you, the key INM-CM5-0 is the primary handle that will make up the directory and file name information, with the sub-components less important for files and directory naming. For consistency, you can amend whatever you like.

I also note that I have not taken your registration information above and merged that across into the source_id.json file - once you have finalised the details I will do that (merge your changes) and then close this issue (which I have just reopened)

[davidhassell]

Hello,

My name is David Hassell and I am part of the ES-DOC team that is working on CMIP6 documentation. As a part of this process, we need a liaison at INM who can act as the interface between the scientists who actually provide the documentation and the ES-DOC team. I was wondering if you are able to help with identifying such a person?

The documentation process has changed considerably since CMIP5 (in response to the feedback that we received), and you can now choose from a variety of documentation methods. Our aim is to train the ES-DOC liaison who can then work with people at INM. No specialist knowledge about ES-DOC nor climate modelling is required, but neither would it be a problem, of course. Some institutes have appointed a member of the modelling team, others not.

I would be very grateful f you could let me know by e-mail (david.hassell at ncas.ac.uk) if you have any suggestions.

All the best,

David Hassell

National Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Reading UK

[durack1]

@volodin1 your model is registered, take a look at CMIP6_source_id.html and let me know if any further changes are required

[volodin1]

Dear David,

Andrey Gritsoun (asgrit@mail.ru) could be liaison person from INM.

Best regadrs, Evgeny

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:22 PM, David Hassell notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello,

My name is David Hassell and I am part of the ES-DOC team that is working on CMIP6 documentation. As a part of this process, we need a liaison at INM who can act as the interface between the scientists who actually provide the documentation and the ES-DOC team. I was wondering if you are able to help with identifying such a person?

The documentation process has changed considerably since CMIP5 (in response to the feedback that we received), and you can now choose from a variety of documentation methods. Our aim is to train the ES-DOC liaison who can then work with people at INM. No specialist knowledge about ES-DOC nor climate modelling is required, but neither would it be a problem, of course. Some institutes have appointed a member of the modelling team, others not.

I would be very grateful f you could let me know by e-mail (david.hassell at ncas.ac.uk) if you have any suggestions.

All the best,

David Hassell

National Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Reading UK

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs/issues/358#issuecomment-310413216, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AcLaeni3mcnVNnGAkpFXoVO1X1gSkTDOks5sGoargaJpZM4N-aj- .

[durack1]

@volodin1 we noted a formatting inconsistency with the aerosol, atmos, land, ocean and seaIce nominal_resolution values for INM-CM5-0, and have now corrected this. Please check your complete model registration details in CMIP6_source_id.html and get back to me with any further tweaks required.

For reference, this issue was caught and resolved in WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs#466