Closed larsbuntemeyer closed 1 year ago
for height levels not request in CMIP6, we derive attributes from the 100m values in CMIP6, e.g., for ua100
(only found in CMIP6_6hrPlev.json
), we would have from CMIP6:
"ua100m": {
"frequency": "6hr",
"modeling_realm": "atmos",
"standard_name": "eastward_wind",
"units": "m s-1",
"cell_methods": "area: time: mean",
"cell_measures": "area: areacella",
"long_name": "Eastward Wind at 100m",
"comment": "Zonal wind at 100m height",
"dimensions": "longitude latitude time height100m",
"out_name": "ua100m",
"type": "real",
"positive": "",
"valid_min": "",
"valid_max": "",
"ok_min_mean_abs": "",
"ok_max_mean_abs": ""
},
from which we would derive other height levels for CORDEX like this (e.g., ua200m
):
"ua200m": {
"frequency": "6hr",
"modeling_realm": "atmos",
"standard_name": "eastward_wind",
"units": "m s-1",
"cell_methods": "area: time: mean",
"cell_measures": "area: areacella",
"long_name": "Eastward Wind at 200m",
"comment": "Zonal wind at 200m height",
"dimensions": "longitude latitude time height200m",
"out_name": "ua200m",
"type": "real",
"positive": "",
"valid_min": "",
"valid_max": "",
"ok_min_mean_abs": "",
"ok_max_mean_abs": ""
},
with the coordinate in CMIP6_coordinates.json
:
"height100m": {
"standard_name": "height",
"units": "m",
"axis": "Z",
"long_name": "height",
"climatology": "",
"formula": "",
"must_have_bounds": "no",
"out_name": "height",
"positive": "up",
"requested": "",
"requested_bounds": "",
"stored_direction": "increasing",
"tolerance": "",
"type": "double",
"valid_max": "120.0",
"valid_min": "80.0",
"value": "100.",
"z_bounds_factors": "",
"z_factors": "",
"bounds_values": "",
"generic_level_name": ""
},
Note that height levels are mentioned in the comment
attribute and in the long_name
attribute.
I agree with that approach. Only
"dimensions": "longitude latitude time height100m",
must also be changed to 200m, of course.
I agree with that approach. Only
"dimensions": "longitude latitude time height100m",
must also be changed to 200m, of course.
true, i'll fix it!
is there some rule how to calculate valid_max
and valid_min
for height coordinates?
a bit late response :-), completely agree. No idea about valid_max
and valid_min
so we can simply use a similar approach 20m above and below a specific height ?
Do we really need valid_max
and valid_min
for height levels ? Both are not defined for pressure levels.
I'll collect some special table variable attributes that are unique to CORDEX here to document.