source_id registration of COSMO-CLM_URB

[marioRaffa]

label

CCLM-6-0-1-URB

label_extended

COSMO model in climate mode (COSMO-CLM), Version 6.0 clm 1 with Urban Parametrization

source_id

CCLM-6-0-1-URB

source_type

ARCM

release_year

2021

activity_participation

DD

institution_id

CLMcom-CMCC

further_info_url

https://www.clm-community.eu/COSMO-CLM/Overview

What license do you choose?

CC BY 4.0

[jesusff]

Thank you, Mario. This is the first attempt to register the COSMO-CLM, at least as a standalone model. It is part of other coupled systems which referred to it in different ways (COSMO-CLM #204, COSMO #195). In CORDEX-CMIP5, it was registered with other names, which included the version (CCLM4-8-17, CCLM5-0-6). I'd just like to make sure that the name registered will be consistent with the upcoming ones from the CLM community. I especially miss a version number, as previous versions of this model have already been used in CORDEX.

@csteger, could you clarify whether there is an agreed naming pattern for COSMO-CLM in CORDEX-CMIP6? Otherwise, we could wait to have a consistent naming. No problem with temporary names in the simulation status (https://github.com/WCRP-CORDEX/simulation-status/pull/25), but changing registered source_ids can be confusing.

Regarding the suffix (URB), it cannot be separated with underscores in the source_id as underscores are used to separate the different DRS elements in the filenames. You could use a dash instead.

Also, the further_info_url points to a list of versions and, when selecting version 6.00, it states that this version is the same as 5.14, and that version 6.00 itself was released in 2021. Since your release_year is 2024, I guess that your URB version is based on COSMO v6.00, but has some other modifications. Could you clarify?

[marioRaffa]

Thanks Jesus. Internally at the CLM-Community we have already received by @csteger (Christian Steger) the "naming-convention CORDEX document" for CMIP6 generation, related to COSMO and ICON. So, following this document, these are the corrections needed to be applied to our previous request:

label CCLM-6-0-1-URB

label_extended COSMO model in climate mode (COSMO-CLM), Version 6.0 clm 1 with Urban Parametrization

source_id CCLM-6-0-1-URB

source_type ARCM

release_year 2021

activity_participation DD

institution_id CLMcom-CMCC

further_info_url https://www.clm-community.eu/COSMO-CLM/Overview

What license do you choose? CC BY 4.0

Is it enough this comment to register the source id or we should open a new issue with the corrections? Thanks

[jesusff]

Perfect, thank you. No need to open a new issue. I changed your original post accordingly, please, check.

Note that there is now a dash between CCLM and the version (CCLM-6-0-1), while in CMIP5 it was all in a row (CCLM5-0-6). No problem at all, just to make sure this is intended. Thanks!

The further_info_url is quite generic, but this is OK for the moment. If in the future there's a publication or document describing this specific version, feel free to update it by reopening this issue or creating a new one.

[csteger]

Sorry for the delay. The standalone model should use the source_id CCLM6-0-1. Versions with other components included can than extend that (like CCLM6-0-1-URB) or use another shourt cut if the name would get too long otherwise (like Ha and Vera are doing for the coupled versions).

[jesusff]

Sorry, no dash, then, between the CCLM and the 6? Shall we keep the label the same as the source_id? One variant could be:

source_id = "CCLM6-0-1-URB"
label = "CCLM v6.0 clm 1 URB"