Open larsbuntemeyer opened 8 months ago
Here are some suggestions for comments taken from CMIP6 tables. These variables had no comments in the original CORDEX CMIP6 data request:
hurs
: "The relative humidity with respect to liquid water for T> 0 C, and with respect to ice for T<0 C."
evspsbl
:"Evaporation at surface (also known as evapotranspiration): flux of water into the atmosphere due to conversion of both liquid and solid phases to vapor (from underlying surface and vegetation)."
prsn
: "at surface; includes precipitation of all forms of water in the solid phase."
clt
: "for the whole atmospheric column, as seen from the surface or the top of the atmosphere. Include both large-scale and convective cloud."
All comments look fine for me and in general we can take all missing comments from the CMIP6 CMOR tables, should be consistent for both GCM and RCM.
Ok, I'll have to check some more comments if they are table or frequency dependent (e.g., its' the case for max/min variables where comments depend).
one more thing to close https://github.com/WCRP-CORDEX/cordex-cmip6-cmor-tables/issues/66
We had our own comment column in the data request table but i think we should use the variable comments attribute from CMIP6.