search

WCRP-CORDEX / data-request-table

Machine readable data request tables
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

consistent `positive` attribute #21

Closed larsbuntemeyer closed 3 months ago

larsbuntemeyer commented 4 months ago

from https://github.com/WCRP-CORDEX/cordex-cmip6-cmor-tables/issues/66

The positive attribute for fluxes like hfls, hfss, rlds, rlus, etc. is not defined in the CORDEX-CMIP6 CMOR tables. Even though the standard_name includes the correct orientation, the attribute is important for the CMOR application. CMOR does not write the positive attribute to the file, but uses it to check and potentially switch the orientation.

Need to check positive attribute...

gnikulin commented 4 months ago

we simply need to define the "positive" attribute for all fluxes as in CMIP6

larsbuntemeyer commented 3 months ago

I'll update the following: