JeroenBosman
commented
4 years ago Always willing to do a simple review from a user perspective. Making a full knowledge graph insightful and searchable potentially delivers a very rich information source, but is also harder and less straightforward than just a set of more or less comparable records. Is there a document on the background of current Scholia interface choices?
Best, Jeroen
https://101innovations.wordpress.com/
Jeroen Bosman, scholarly communication specialist and faculty liaison for the Faculty of Geosciences | Utrecht University Libraryhttp://www.uu.nl/library | email: j.bosman@uu.nlmailto:j.bosman@uu.nl |telephone: +31.6.24865967 | mail: Postbus 80124, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands |visiting address: room 2.16, Heidelberglaan 3, Utrechthttps://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=heidelberglaan%203%20utrecht#map=16/52.0851/5.1776 | Web: Jeroen Bosmanhttp://www.uu.nl/university/library/en/disciplines/geo/Pages/ContactBosman.aspx | twitter @jeroenbosmanhttps://twitter.com/jeroenbosman / @geolibrarianUBUhttps://twitter.com/geolibrarianUBU | profiles: : Academiahttp://uu.academia.edu/JeroenBosman / Google Scholarhttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=-IfPy3IAAAAJ&hl=en / ISNIhttp://www.isni.org/0000000028810209 / MicrosoftAcademichttp://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/51538592/jeroen-bosman / ORCIDhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727 / ResearcherIDhttp://www.researcherid.com/ProfileView.action?queryString=KG0UuZjN5WmCiHc%252FMC4oLVEKrQQu%252BpzQ8%252F9yrRrmi8Y%253D&Init=Yes&SrcApp=CR&returnCode=ROUTER.Success&SID=N27lOD6EgipnADLnAbK / ResearchGatehttp://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeroen_Bosman/ / Scopushttp://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=7003519484 / Figsharehttps://figshare.com/authors/Jeroen_Bosman/682654 / VIAFhttp://viaf.org/viaf/36099266/ / Worldcathttp://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-n91-100619 | blogging at: I&M 2.0http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/ (with others) | member of the Open Science Community Utrecht OSCU)https://openscience-utrecht.com/portfolio/jeroen-bosman/ 101 innovations in scholarly communicationhttps://101innovations.wordpress.com/
From: Egon Willighagen notifications@github.com Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2019 07:52 To: fnielsen/scholia scholia@noreply.github.com Cc: Bosman, J.M. (Jeroen) j.bosman@uu.nl; Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: [fnielsen/scholia] "Ten best practices for faceted search" evaluation (#995)
@JeroenBosmanhttps://github.com/JeroenBosman set up an evaluation scheme for faceted searching. I have asked him to look at Scholia too: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZiCUuKNse8dwHRFAyhFsZsl6kG0Fkgaj5gttdwdVZEM/edit?ts=5df405c3#gid=0
So far, we're not doing well, also because our aspects are basically predefined "faceted searches", but we have been talking about it, and can always use independent views on what Scholia might be.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/fnielsen/scholia/issues/995?email_source=notifications&email_token=ACY7B3BV34AIB6EA4TZ2QLLQYR7B7A5CNFSM4J2ZCD52YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4IAPLDLA, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACY7B3BCF3E74ZWLCI3HK2LQYR7B7ANCNFSM4J2ZCD5Q.
egonw
@JeroenBosman set up an evaluation scheme for faceted searching. I have asked him to look at Scholia too: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZiCUuKNse8dwHRFAyhFsZsl6kG0Fkgaj5gttdwdVZEM/edit?ts=5df405c3#gid=0
So far, we're not doing well, also because our
aspectsare basically predefined "faceted searches", but we have been talking about it, and can always use independent views on what Scholia might be.