WEC-Sim / WEC-Sim

Wave Energy Converter Simulator (WEC-Sim), an open-source code for simulating wave energy converters.
https://wec-sim.github.io/WEC-Sim
Apache License 2.0
141 stars 159 forks source link

[Theory or Implementation] Performance of the model at resonant frequency #1254

Closed Aiswariak closed 3 months ago

Aiswariak commented 3 months ago

Hi, I am analyzing the performance of a single DOF model at resonant frequency. The model is subjected to a regular wave with wave period which is equal to the natural period of the model. I am expecting a higher heave response as the model moves at resonance conditions. But, I am getting a lower value at this wave period. But if I am increasing the wave period than the natural period, higher responses are obtained and by decreasing the period still lesser response are obtained. All the simulations are performed for a same wave height.

I have attached the folder for your reference. I am using WEC-Sim 4.2 version. SWEC_resonance.zip

Kindly help. Thanks in advance

jtgrasb commented 3 months ago

Thank you for your question. We ask users to open GitHub issues using an appropriate template. This is helpful for the WEC-Sim team to classify issues, and address questions more thoroughly and efficiently. We hope this will be beneficial for developers, users and the WEC-Sim community in general.

Can you please edit this issue to use the appropriate issue template and include more detail about your setup and how you determined the natural period? Thank you.

Aiswariak commented 3 months ago

Thank you for the response. I have raised the issue under " Theory or implementation clarification". I do not understand clearly on how to use the appropriate issue template. Kindly help on this regard as well.

I have estimated the heave natural frequency using the theoretical expression as well as by doing a heave decay analysis. I am also getting a maximum RAO value in heave at this frequency from the hydrodynamic diffraction study in ANSYS AQWA.

Thank you.

jtgrasb commented 3 months ago

We ask users to maintain the headers in the issue template so we can sort through the information and efficiently address the issue.

jtgrasb commented 3 months ago

Hi @Aiswariak, I got a chance to look at your attached WEC-Sim model. When I remove the pto damping, I see no issues. The free decay shows a natural period of around 0.5 s. This is also matched by the response amplitude across the range of frequencies. image image

With a pto damping of 20, your system is very damped. Adding damping to the system increases the natural period (decreases natural frequency) so it is not surprising that you are getting higher responses for higher periods. If this does not resolve your issue, please show me your method for calculating the natural period.

A few other tips:

Aiswariak commented 3 months ago

Hi @jtgrasb, Thank you for the detailed response. This solves my issue. I will take care of the tips as well.

Thanks and regards