Open jeff665547 opened 4 months ago
1 some people have used PennCNV for low resolution array such as the IBC array with 50k markers. 2 depending on whether it is evenly spaced array, or whether it is a candidate gene based array, some post-calling adjustment are needed 3 I do not have other recommendations, except to manually examine the data and calling results to know what is reasonable 4 as I mentioned in 1
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 6:11 AM jeff665547 @.***> wrote:
We need to determine whether PennCNV, a popular tool for CNV detection, is appropriate and effective for analyzing data generated from low-resolution arrays (such as array-CGH with an overall median probe genomi spacing of 40-60 kb).
- Can PennCNV effectively handle data from this kind of low-resolution arrays?
- What are the limitations and challenges associated with using PennCNV for CNV detection in datasets with larger probe spacings?
- Are there any recommended adjustments or alternative approaches for analyzing CNVs in low-resolution array data?
- Are there any known studies or experiences demonstrating the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of PennCNV in this context?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WGLab/PennCNV/issues/118, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNG3OANJ5SMTPPD3EBIWMTY2KLMBAVCNFSM6AAAAABFKR4FIGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGIYTAMZYGEZDIMI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
We need to determine whether PennCNV is appropriate and effective for analyzing data generated from low-resolution arrays (such as array-CGH with an overall median probe genomi spacing of 40-60 kb).