Closed Raku0130 closed 2 years ago
Thank you for your proposal.
the IMU data sent from WHILL is the raw IMU data, not the degree per sec.
This is correct.
The detail is described in this document
Also, as mentioned about the mounting position, it is mounted at an angle to the fuselage, so it is not subject to gravitational acceleration in only one axis.
Also, I am sorry to say that we excluded IMU data from ros_whill because it is difficult to use for robotics due to the accuracy of the sensor, and it is difficult to handle due to the mounting position of the sensor. Therefore, even if the data is correct, we do not plan to officially support IMU data. There is no problem to use IMU Data in the fork.
Sorry. I wasn't aware of that document.
I understand now why you excluded it from ros_whill. Thank you for the explanation.
The IMU data is disabled in the latest version because it is not reliable. #28 However, the IMU data sent from WHILL is the raw IMU data, not the degree per sec. Therefore, the correct value can be obtained by calculating according to the resolution. IMU datasheet
IMU topic after fixation
When this acceleration data is converted to acceleration at base_link, it looks like this. We can see that the gravitational acceleration is correctly observed and the IMU is functioning properly.
IMU is disabled in the latest version, but can it be re-enabled?