Open mbrosnahan opened 6 months ago
The aft_camera
node is commented out.
I took a shot at this, first by updating main.launch on our instrument and doing a rebuild using docker build -t whoi/phyto-arm .
from PhytO-ARM root dir. No change in behavior.
Next, I tried committing changes to NF's multi-winch branch (what is checked out on system currently deployed). Ran build as above and again no change in behavior.
I also mucked around trying to change fore/aft to ifcb/chanos in camera names. This didn't have any effect. Only topic /camera/fore_camera/image/compressed is published. I must not be changing correct files. What else am I doing wrong?
Right now, we configure in config as:
camera: fore_camera: video_stream_url: "rtsp://user:pw@cam1ip/" aft_camera: video_stream_url: "rtsp://user/pw@cam2ip/"
The trouble is that we’re only able to view fore_camera, not aft_camera (and we definitely need both). It'd also be helpful if topic name would be formed using secondary parameters under camera, e.g. so that fore_camera might be replaced with 'north_campera' and data published at /camera/north_camera/compressed/image
Current behavior is that the system is only publishing /camera/fore_camera/image/compressed regardless of whether fore_camera or aft_camera are commented out in above.