Open sezerh24 opened 4 months ago
Isn't this already included in your storage term ? Anyway - interesting problem. What is the source of the model ?
Well, I added in the storage term, but i think we should not add in the storage term. I was wondering if there is a way to add this term in the reaction or source term? Here is the paper (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104892).
Arguello, M.E., Labanda, N.A., Calo, V.M., Gumulya, M., Utikar, R. and Derksen, J., 2022. Dendrite formation in rechargeable lithium-metal batteries: Phase-field modeling using open-source finite element library. Journal of Energy Storage, 53, p.104892.
Ok I will think about a simpler test problem which (hopefully...) proves to you that adding this in the storage term is correct...
Anyway interesting and challenging application. I am also working partially in electrochemistry, so getting this working would be really interesting for me. If you are interested, we could work on this together on a shared repository. Please note however that this would be not the only problem I am working on...
Hi Jurgen,
I will be happy to work with you on this problem. I will create the repository and share with you shortly.
Thank you. Hayri
Hi I am trying to solve the following set of PDEs:
I have implemented the reaction term: function reactionLi!(f,u,node)
f[ξₙ] = -Lₙdh_dξ(u[ξₙ])((exp((1-α)neFu[ϕₙ]/R/T)) - u[ζₙ](exp(-αneFu[ϕₙ]/R/T))) - Lσdg_dξ(u[ξₙ]) end
Here is my storage term:
function storageLi!(f,u,node) f[ξₙ] = u[ξₙ]
f[ζₙ] = u[ζₙ]+(Cₘₛ/C₀)u[ξₙ]#ξₙ_val f[ϕₙ] = neFCₘₛu[ξₙ] end
The ζₙ indeed includes the time derivative of ξₙ, as a reaction/source term, I do not know how I can pass this time derivative as a reaction/source term. Could you please mind to help on this issue?