In w3c/permissions#263, we're trying to move all the powerful features into the "parent" spec, rather than define a registry in the spec. That's what this PR does.
That said, if the intent is for background-sync to be enabled by default is it really a "powerful feature"? It doesn't seem to be the case that express permission is required for a UA to enable the API.
marcoscaceres
commented
2 years ago
In w3c/permissions#263, we're trying to move all the powerful features into the "parent" spec, rather than define a registry in the spec. That's what this PR does.
That said, if the intent is for background-sync to be enabled by default is it really a "powerful feature"? It doesn't seem to be the case that express permission is required for a UA to enable the API.
(Currently Permissions claims it is, https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#background-sync)
Thoughts @mkruisselbrink @marcoscaceres?
See also w3c/permissions#308.