search

WICG / inert

Polyfill for the inert attribute and property.
Other
924 stars 81 forks source link

Mark repo as host of software development #154

Closed dontcallmedom closed 4 years ago

dontcallmedom commented 4 years ago

It looks like the repo is now more about the polyfill than spec development, so I'm suggesting to use repo-type: tool instead of cg-report

marcoscaceres commented 4 years ago

Thanks! I didn't know this ("repo-type": "tool") was a thing.

Other folks here, if this is becoming a tool, it might be time to move this out of the WICG - as it's there not going to be deliverables destined for a particular W3C or WHATWG working group? Or is the intent still to have this become part of HTML?

marcoscaceres commented 4 years ago

Oh, never mind, I think this is supposed to go into HTML https://whatpr.org/html/4288/interaction.html#the-inert-attribute

marcoscaceres commented 4 years ago

@alice, any chance of a quick summary of what's left for to be merged? https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4288

The spec part of this incubation looks like it has more or less migrated HTML spec (which is fantastic!). Would you say there is much more incubation work to be done here?

cc @WICG/chairs

alice commented 4 years ago

Yes, it's meant to end up in HTML. Still waiting on that PR to be merged, which I think requires two shipped implementations?

marcoscaceres commented 4 years ago

Ok, cool - any interest from WebKit and Gecko folks? What about in terms of further incubation work? Would you say the design/architecture of this is done?

alice commented 4 years ago

The Mozilla Standards Position PR is still open: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/pull/371 - possibly pending resolution of https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5650

WebKit indicated their intent on https://github.com/WICG/inert/issues/69#issuecomment-489915986

From my point of view the design/architecture is done, but it seems that there is not agreement on that end from Mozilla folks.

marcoscaceres commented 4 years ago

From my point of view the design/architecture is done, but it seems that there is not agreement on that end from Mozilla folks.

Thanks for the links! they were really helpful. Looks like Mozilla are going with "worth prototyping", which is a positive signal. Hoping you will come to a speedy resolution in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5650