search

WICG / intrinsicsize-attribute

Proposal to add an intrinsicsize attribute to media elements
Apache License 2.0
93 stars 14 forks source link

Add note that proposal is not being pursued #18

Closed jpchase closed 5 years ago

jpchase commented 5 years ago

@yoavweiss Would you review? I don't know anyone else with access. I want to make it clear that instrinsicsize is not being pursued anymore.

eeeps commented 5 years ago

Was there a public discussion about this somewhere?

Is Chrome planning to support Mozilla’s width/height-reusing proposal, instead? (#16)

jpchase commented 5 years ago

The main reason to add this note is to point to #16 (specifically this comment), to make it clear that's where efforts are focused now, rather than the intrinsicsize proposal. Chrome is planning to support that proposal (also see this comment for the Chromium bug to track the work).

Chrome folks started the intrinsicsize proposal, and we aren't aware of any other folks working on it, so it seems appropriate to set expectations.

Do you think it would be helpful to add more explanatory text? My thinking was that #16 would provide enough context.

eeeps commented 5 years ago

Yeah, adding a note to the top of the README would be helpful (ala https://github.com/WICG/user-gesture-nav or https://github.com/WICG/aspect-ratio).

Edit: I'm a dummy and thought this was an issue, and didn't notice that this was a pull request doing exactly that! To answer your question: the proposed wording seems fine!

And I suppose after the open threads from #16 (and other issues?) have been captured in issues on HTML (and CSS-Sizing?), archive this repo.