Editorial: Align with Web IDL specification

[autokagami]

🤖 This is an automated pull request to align the spec with the latest Web IDL specification. 🤖

The followings are the Web IDL validation messages, which may help understanding this PR:

• Validation error at line 5 in local-font-access,1, inside `interface FontManager -> operation query -> argument options`:
  >> query(QueryOptions options);
                      ^

  Error: Dictionary argument must be optional if it has no required fields

Currently this autofix might introduce awkward code formatting, and feel free to manually fix it whenever it happens.

Please file an issue at https://github.com/saschanaz/webidl-updater/issues/new if you think this is invalid or should be enhanced.

[foolip]

This is the precise same edit as in https://github.com/WICG/local-font-access/pull/64. (I don't mind which is merged.)

[saschanaz]

I wonder the bot should run daily instead of weekly 🤔

Maybe https://github.com/saschanaz/webidl-updater/issues/76 is the blocker since otherwise it will keep opening new issues/PRs when the previous one is closed as a duplicate.

[inexorabletash]

Oops, this was a dupe. Closing I guess.