WICG / protected-auction-services-discussion

Other
13 stars 2 forks source link

TEEs in Non Public DCs #14

Open kevinkiklee opened 9 months ago

kevinkiklee commented 9 months ago

From fledge-docs created by thegreatfatzby: privacysandbox/fledge-docs#34

This was one of my questions originally in issue #29 , but after some internal discussion I wanted to be more specific and dig in on this one in particular.

TEEs I am no security expert, so if there's something very obvious here than apologies, but has any consideration been given to TEEs running in non-public-cloud environments but providing the necessary constraints, attestations, etc, through some combination of technical and audit requirements? I ask because one of the twix-inesses I see here is that Ad Techs (at least the one I work for) will likely continue to have to support some set of existing use cases outside of a Fledge/Parakeet context, and those use cases are of size anywhere between non-trivial and quite substantial. Having to setup a TEE inside of a non-public-dc with some set of even relatively "intrusive" requirements could be preferable to forcing network and system topologies.

lbdvt commented 7 months ago

I strongly support the need for support of TEEs running in non-public-cloud environments, as Ad tech companies should have the ability to choose between hosted or cloud-based infrastructure. That's a key decision from a cost and operation perspective.

rdgordon-index commented 4 months ago

https://github.com/privacysandbox/protected-auction-services-docs/pull/127 has now yielded https://github.com/privacysandbox/protected-auction-services-docs/blob/main/public_cloud_tees.md