Closed hober closed 3 years ago
This all looks good and makes sense to me.
On a related note, on format, I think I generally prefer "@a.com @b.com" (maybe there is an analogy to be made with twitter at-replies) or maybe "@a.com > @b.com" (maybe there is an analogy that can be made with CSS selectors) rather than a new token type (which I was hoping to reserve for new values to be passed to the origins). So, something along the lines of:
@a.com @b.com #1234 $50
That is, from a mental model perspective I have this separation between AUDIENCE : CONTENT in formatting (e.g. "@example.com #18923") and would like to see that cohesion hold over time as we expand both AUDIENCE (e.g. to iframes) and CONTENT (e.g. for payment tokens).
I dunno if that breakdown between AUDIENCE : CONTENT makes sense (and happy to be convinced otherwise), but just wanted to explain my mental model so far :)
Note to self: rebase this after #7 lands.
Fixes #4.