Closed bcoe closed 3 years ago
I think we might have missed this in the previous update, but shouldn't the hexademical representation be a single character now? No padding needed?
@domenic I believe padding is necessary, from the spec:
hexOctet = hexDigit hexDigit
hexDigit =
"0" / "1" / "2" / "3" / "4" / "5" / "6" / "7" / "8" / "9" /
"a" / "b" / "c" / "d" / "e" / "f" /
"A" / "B" / "C" / "D" / "E" / "F"
So each byte
, in our case, represents two hexDigits
, which will include "0".
An example where this comes up:
009db818-af0a-42ad-8084-5b6faba5c24a
@domenic forgotten 😝
Follow up to #5, based on @ctavan's feedback. This simplifies the algorithm steps, moving them closer to those described in RFC4122 (_they're almost identical to his reference implementation in Chromium_).
The one part I thought was a bit ugly was how giant step 5 becomes, overall I liked this approach better though.
Fixes #9
Preview | Diff