search

WISDEM / WEIS

Wind Energy with Integrated Servo-controls Toolset
https://weis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Apache License 2.0
51 stars 38 forks source link

OLAF changes hub height? #311

Open mlidGWT opened 2 weeks ago

mlidGWT commented 2 weeks ago

Description

Hello,

I recently ran a test to familiarize myself with OLAF. With a fresh conda environment and clone of the WEIS repository develop branch, I modified the modeling_options.yaml from Example 06 to run DLC 6.1, first with a BEM baseline (no changes to the yaml beyond the output file prefix and folder name, and the change to DLC 6.1) and then duplicated to an OLAF version, where I copied in the Level3>AeroDyn section from the Example 08 OLAF modeling_options.yaml file without changing any values. I ran WEIS in both instances pointing to the same IEA 15MW RWT geometry file and analysis_options.yaml (both from Example 06, though I removed the optimizations in analysis_options).

When the simulations completed, I started by looking at the wind profiles in PyDatView and was confused to see that they were different, since the case matrix files indicated the same wind seed had been used. With some further digging, I saw that in the 'Turbine/Model Specifications' section of the wind *.sum files, the Hub Height was correctly listed as 150m for the baseline case, but somehow changed to 450m for the OLAF case, with a correspondingly large wind field.

I have not knowingly changed the hub height for the OLAF case, and the InflowWind.dat files are identical between the two scenarios beyond the filename prefixes specified in the modeling_options_*.yamls, both with all references to height indicating 150m. Have I unwittingly changed the hub height through the copied OLAF parameters? None of the parameter names indicates it should modify hub height, which is confirmed by the parameter descriptions here.

Please advise! I am attaching a zip folder, OLAF_TestsZip.zip that includes all relevant files and a brief Readme as to the contents. Let me know if additional information is needed.

Steps to reproduce issue

See linked zip folder with files used to run the simulations and WEIS's outputs.

ptrbortolotti commented 2 weeks ago

hello @mlidGWT, you've run into an issue that we had in the past where OLAF was crashing when the wake was hitting the ground. to go around this weakness of OpenFAST, we artificially increased the hub height. at the time we were working with a stiff tower and no shear, and so we could do this. I am not sure anymore if this bug in OpenFAST has been fixed. could you please try commenting out https://github.com/WISDEM/WEIS/blob/03b0c1fb5716bb9f2593d7a43833f3170cc7d000/weis/aeroelasticse/openmdao_openfast.py#L1810 and run again?

mlidGWT commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @ptrbortolotti thanks for the quick response! I commented out the whole if statement around the line you indicated, as TurbSim choked with the hub height being less than half the grid height (dlc_generator.cases[i_case].GridHeight *= 3. remained before I commented out the whole statement). With that change, the simulation completed and produced an out file with results, so either my simulation scenario didn't trigger the OpenFAST bug or it has been fixed.

ptrbortolotti commented 2 weeks ago

@andrew-platt will know if this bug has been fixed in OpenFAST v3.5.3

ptrbortolotti commented 2 weeks ago

and thank you @mlidGWT !

andrew-platt commented 2 weeks ago

@mlidGWT, which version of OpenFAST are you using? In checking the OLAF code, I see a few changes have been made to the wake reflection in the dev branch from a PR that has not made it into a release yet (#1791).

andrew-platt commented 2 weeks ago

Another possibility is that PR #1748 fixed an issue with wakes going outside the bounds of the wind file, including too close to the ground. This was included in the 3.5.1 release

mlidGWT commented 2 weeks ago

@mlidGWT, which version of OpenFAST are you using? In checking the OLAF code, I see a few changes have been made to the wake reflection in the dev branch from a PR that has not made it into a release yet (#1791).

Hi Andy, according to my conda environment, I am running OpenFAST version 3.5.3