Closed bbockelm closed 8 months ago
Thanks, do you know whether it's possible to fix the link?
I think I fixed it?
Hi all, as the discussion in #2 had not converged yet, we may want to discuss this PR in an AuthZ WG call (e.g. on Dec 16) before merging it.
Hi all, as the discussion in #2 had not converged yet, we may want to discuss this PR in an AuthZ WG call (e.g. on Dec 16) before merging it.
I can drop this onto the agenda for the 16th now
Hi all, I propose to have this PR superseded by #46 instead.
Superseded by #46 .
This is a replacement for #2; it removes the text about implicit authorizations and makes a strong requirement for explicit-only group authorization.