Open danaderp opened 3 years ago
Hi David, thanks for this summary. I think the most important thing to emphasize from the meeting is measuring, quantitatively, how well these information theory measures predict traceability performance. Then for certain patterns that we observe, we can prescribe some recoomendations. Just wanted to say this in my own words so I didn't forget my line of thinking ;-)
Time: 13:00 -14:00 Purpose: To discuss results and organization of the paper in information theory for traceability Attendees: Denys Poshyvanyk, Kevin moran, and David Nader
Summary: In the meeting, it was introduced the importance of having a robust statistical method based on information theory to analyze traceability data. Usually, Software Researchers have been focusing only on evaluating models or algorithms to assess the effectiveness of traceability techniques, paying little attention to the data performance. However, using information transmission analysis on software artifacts allow us to identify inconsistencies or imbalances in the traceability data. We hypothesized that using standard Neural Unsupervised approaches, which captures concepts or semantic entities from artifacts, might not generate reliable trace-links. This research proposes a robust data science methodology to be employed in future empirical research for software traceability evaluations.
Main Discussion Points:
Open Questions and Action Items: