Closed ArchdukeTim closed 4 years ago
However, a good example of generating useful UI without fxml could be useful as many people come to think that JavaFX requires fxmls
If there was more than one more term of JavaFX, I would, but after experimenting I've found ways of making fxmls actually quite easy to work with, and in some cases even easier than having a scene.
Out of curiosity, what does Wong plan to switch to instead of JavaFX?
He's thinking angular for future years. But I'm gonna try to convince him to not due to OOAD (4233) being in Java
Wong is only using javafx for one more term. It isn't worth it to try to switch everything over to not fxml