search

WSSSPE / WG-Best-Practices

White paper/journal paper on best practices developing sustainable scientific software
10 stars 4 forks source link

Timeline for drafts of paper sections? #1

Open kyleniemeyer opened 8 years ago

kyleniemeyer commented 8 years ago

Do we have a planned timeline for finishing the paper? I agree it would be good to get it wrapped up before WSSSPE4, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who would work better with a deadline for writing my section(s)... 😃

abani1 commented 8 years ago

We did have one that is now obsolete -- I will post a revised one shortly

On May 20, 2016, at 2:22 AM, Kyle Niemeyer notifications@github.com wrote:

Do we have a planned timeline for finishing the paper? I agree it would be good to get it wrapped up before WSSSPE4, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who would work better with a deadline for writing my section(s)... 😃

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

sandragesing commented 8 years ago

I would like to suggest the following timeline [10 Jun] Scope per section finished [10 Jun] Leading authors and contributors per section finalized [15 Jul] First versions of sections finalized [31 Jul] Distribution to WSSSPE community [31 Aug] Final version of white paper after internal editing [10 Sep] Submission of peer-reviewed journal paper?

tomcrick commented 8 years ago

Hello, are we still doing this or has it been merged into something else?

sandragesing commented 8 years ago

Hi, I followed up with authors via email but we are again far behind. Vacation time;-) I will start discussions again in github.

tomcrick commented 8 years ago

Ah no probs! Keen to help out with this too.

sandragesing commented 8 years ago

Being at WSSSPE4 we got more people interested again in the white paper. We will suggest a new timeline. Maybe we aim for a special issue or conference to have a "hard" deadline. This is our suggestion for now (the current leads are staying as well as the sections): [30 Sep] Final structure agreed (new section on user interfaces) [31 Oct] Scope per section finished [31 Oct] Leading authors and contributors per section finalized [31 Jan] First versions of sections finalized [28 Feb] Distribution to WSSSPE community [31 March] Final version of white paper after internal editing [10 Apr] Submission of peer-reviewed journal paper?

dangunter commented 8 years ago

I am interested in helping with "usability". My department has a whole group about that, which I can represent & channel.

-Dan

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:37 AM, sandragesing notifications@github.com wrote:

Being at WSSSPE4 we got more people interested again in the white paper. We will suggest a new timeline. Maybe we aim for a special issue or conference to have a "hard" deadline. This is our suggestion for now (the current leads are staying as well as the sections): [30 Sep] Final structure agreed (new section on usability) [31 Oct] Scope per section finished [31 Oct] Leading authors and contributors per section finalized [31 Jan] First versions of sections finalized [28 Feb] Distribution to WSSSPE community [31 March] Final version of white paper after internal editing [10 Apr] Submission of peer-reviewed journal paper?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/WSSSPE/WG-Best-Practices/issues/1#issuecomment-246723458, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZsOwMIW0y_LprJJ1qHAGowJ34qROLhks5qpsNMgaJpZM4Ii6z8 .

sandragesing commented 8 years ago

Thanks, Dan. We have opened an issue on related work so that we relate to existing publications and can distinguish our paper from it.

chicoqueiroz commented 8 years ago

Hi Dan, nice to meet you! I have opened an Issue for us to discuss the User Interface section. Looking forward to collaborating with you.

chicoqueiroz commented 7 years ago

Hi everyone,

According to our timeline, the list of authors / contributors and scope per section are due today.

So far, we have listed: Leading author for Related Work: Kyle Niemeyer Leading author for Case Studies: Alexander Konovalov, contributors: Kyle Niemyer Leading author for Funding: Neil Chue Hong (potentially), contributors: Sandra Gesing, Abani Patra, Daniel S. Katz Leading author for Metrics: Dan Katz, contributors: Neil Chue Hong Leading author for Tools: Hans Fangohr (potentially) Leading author for Usability: Francisco Queiroz, contributors: Dan Gunter

Sections with no listed authors: Community Related Practices; Government and Management. Is anyone interested in these sections? Also, is anyone else interested in joining other sections?

Our next milestone should be 31 Jan. (First version of sections finalized) – is that OK?

Best regards

danielskatz commented 7 years ago

The date seems ok. @npch, is there useful info from the mozfest event we can pull into the metrics section? I didn't quite find the results in the repo, and the etherpad didn't look like it got used, so I'm not sure what happened, other than a picture in a tweet :)

olexandr-konovalov commented 7 years ago

Thank you - OK with me, and the new timeline seems favourable.

chicoqueiroz commented 7 years ago

I know the deadline for this paper has been moved several times before, but do you think we could/should move it again? I'd like to add some new material (and I haven't seen many contributions – I'm actually curious to see what we've got so far).