Open strambc opened 2 years ago
Currently, we have a field called:
Channel/IlluminationType with enumeration values drawn from
https://ontobee.org/ontology/FBbi?iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/FBbi_00000345
Should this be merged or different?
Also we have a field called:
Experiment/IlluminationMethod with enumeration values drawn from
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/FBbi_00000031
Should this be merged or different?
I feel they should be left separated despite the fact that they overlap significantly. It is a reality that the fluorescence labeling of the samples is not always a perfect match with what is available on a particular microscope. Keeping them separated will help microscopy reproducibility in the long term.
Secondly, when looking/browsing at microscopy datasets in OMERO, it's important to know if the images are laser scanning, tirf, spinning disk etc. The IDR.openmicroscopy.org suffers there. 65 datasets are marked as "Fluorescence microscopy", that could be epifluorescence, laser scanning, etc. Interpretation of the data could be different.
Element name(s): Channel
Justification for the addition (brief and compelling): your input here
Full description of the proposed addition (enough detail to implement): your input here
Source of change (e.g., #XXX issue with change request):
Suggested by Judith Lacoste
Brief description of the change and its rationale (short and compelling):
your input here
New Element name: __
New Field name: Imaging Mode
New Element/Field description: __
New Element/Field Tier: Tier 1
New Field Data type: Enum
New Field requirement level: REQUIRED
New Field enumeration value(s): Use values from attached document
Technology-organisation-schema_Euro-BioImaging-2022.pdf
https://www.eurobioimaging.eu/upload/Technology-organisation-schema_Euro-BioImaging-2022.pdf