Open brianbunke opened 7 years ago
I think it is a good idea to allow for custom filtering.
I personally like the Get-VM | Where-Object {"server1","server2" -notcontains $_.Name}
(Because not many people use tags where I work. I can't trust our admins to tag things appropriately)
Another option that we discussed in the Slack channel last night:
Get-VM | Where Name -ne 'asdf' | Invoke-Vester
Accepting piped VIObjects would either overwrite the scope settings in your config file on that run, or completely eliminate them.
Currently, filtering each scope consists of
Get-VM -Name YOURINPUTHERE
& similar for other scopes.That's ok, but leaves room for improvement. For example,
Get-VM -Tag YOURTAGHERE
would be a pretty sweet option.Is that enough? Should we allow people to fully craft their own queries? That would allow
Get-VM | Where Name -notlike 'abc'
.Get-VM -Datastore YOURDATASTOREHERE
is also a thing. Get-VM may have another useful parameter, or more useful parameters in the future. Who knows how many useful filtering parameters exist on the rest of the scopes right now.However, currently, we're actually doing:
Will people know to replicate that, or realize that parent scopes may not apply? We could display, on-screen, the results of your query (like after you set it in
New-VesterConfig
), but some people have thousands of VMs, so I've held off on doing that.I personally think inventory tags are sweet, and enough to solve this problem. But I'm interested in your feedback before I get started!