9.1 想说的话

[Wangmengguo]

中国没有民主。

中国所谓的民主就是找一个「皇帝」，用「公权力」抹杀「私有权力」。如果要是有个「平民」出来主持「民主」，那代价一定是被「攻击」，最后「辞职」。

「无他」，对「权力」的迷信到了骨子里。

所有攻击者都不会认识到正是自己对于「私欲」的维护，导致了「大众利益」无法被维护，最终使得「自己的利益」也毫无保障。

攻击者无法意识到，「民主」很多时候意味着「私有权力」的退让，是「少数人的妥协」，甚至是「多数人少数领域的妥协」。

攻击者永远不会明白，对于「民主」自己才是最大的「阻碍者」。

群众中一直都有「坏人」。

最可怕的是，满腔热血主持「民主」的平民从此不愿相信「民主」，甚至转而相信「中国人太多，需要中国特色的民主形式」。

这本质是一种「恶性循环」，由于大多数中国人没有对于「民主」的正确认识，导致「极权国家体制」在很多时候成为了唯一的「解法」。

没有「皇帝」，就再造一个「皇帝」，不然这事谁说得算呀？

「你们说是不是？」

[Wangmengguo]

Claude 3.5 Sonent

China lacks democracy.

China's "democracy" means finding an "emperor" to erase private power with public power. A commoner promoting democracy faces attacks and resignation.

People deeply worship power.

Attackers don't see their self-interest hurts public good, leaving their own interests unprotected.

They don't realize democracy often means private power yields. It's compromise by the few, sometimes by many in few areas.

Attackers never understand they're democracy's biggest obstacle.

There are always "bad people" in crowds.

Worst is when idealistic commoners lose faith in democracy, believing China needs a "special form" of it.

This vicious cycle stems from misunderstanding democracy. It makes authoritarianism seem like the only solution.

Without an "emperor," people make a new one. Who else decides?

"Don't you agree?"

[Wangmengguo]

ChatGPT 4o

Here’s your translation, Dearing:

---

China has no democracy.

China's so-called democracy is just finding an "emperor" to use "public power" to crush "private power." If an "ordinary person" tries to lead democracy, they will be "attacked" and ultimately "forced to resign."

Why? The belief in "power" runs deep.

Attackers fail to realize that their defense of "self-interest" prevents the "public interest" from being upheld, which in turn leaves their "own interests" unprotected.

They don't see that "democracy" often means the retreat of "private power," a "compromise of the minority," or even a "majority's compromise in certain areas."

They'll never understand that they are the greatest "obstacle" to "democracy."

There have always been "bad actors" among the masses.

The most terrifying thing is when passionate citizens who once advocated for "democracy" lose faith in it, and even start believing that "China has too many people, and needs a uniquely Chinese form of democracy."

This is essentially a "vicious cycle." Most Chinese lack a correct understanding of "democracy," leading the "authoritarian state system" to often become the only "solution."

Without an "emperor," they'll simply create a new one. Otherwise, who would have the final say?

"Wouldn't you agree?"