Closed chrisgrieser closed 6 months ago
Unfortunately, I am not able to reproduce the bug using undo/redo. If you're able to reproduce it again, please post the action steps, Neovim version, plugin setup and piece of code.
So, the problem still occurs regularly, I think it's a combination of a function name being modified while having high CPU usage, but that's just a guess, since I cannot reproduce this really.
However, I was thinking, one simple way to kinda workaround this issue could be to allow for customization of the loading-text. In that case one could set the loading-text to an empty string 🙈
However, I was thinking, one simple way to kinda workaround this issue could be to allow for customization of the loading-text. In that case one could set the loading-text to an empty string 🙈
You can already do this with request_pending_text = ''
.
I will try to investigate the issue with this problem in more detail.
This happens almost every time I create a new function in typescript
in conjunction with Angular
.
I have similar issue in Golang.
I have similar issue in Golang.
@mortymacs, please describe the steps to reproduce the bug.
I have similar issue in Golang.
@mortymacs, please describe the steps to reproduce the bug.
Sure! The steps that I just tried now:
$ mkdir hello && cd hello
$ go mod init hello
$ nvim main.go
Now add this:
package main
type User struct{}
type Class struct{}
func main() {
}
It worked fine before saving, and, as soon as I saved the file, it showed duplication.
This is what it showed:
Ok, I was able to replicate the bug with gopls
and after #56 it should work.
But most likely it's not the same bug as in the original issue, because the problem was in code that was added later than the creation of this issue.
@chrisgrieser, is the original issue still there after #56? (I still can't reproduce it).
At least on my end, the issue does not occur anymore. Maybe some other commit in the meantime has fixed the issue?
Thanks for the info.
Maybe some other commit in the meantime has fixed the issue?
Yeah, maybe. Then I'll close this is issue if the problem no longer occured.
I am not 100% sure how to reproduce this, but I think one way to reproduce this are undos/redos where a function name or function existence is modified.