Closed xh-ui closed 3 months ago
Hi @xh-ui,
The EPOCH ionisation routines consider isolated atoms instead of molecules. To simulate field ionisation of SiO2, you should define separate Si and O species.
To show how this is done, I have modified the field ionisation demo in our documentation. If we assume SiO2 has a density of 2650 kg/m³, and an SiO2 molecule has a mass of 60u, then SiO2 has a number density of $2.7\times 10^{28} \text{ m}^{-3}$. For each molecule, there is 1 Si and 2 O, so the densities for these species are: $2.7\times 10^{28} \text{ m}^{-3}$ and $5.3\times 10^{28} \text{ m}^{-3}$ respectively.
A simple input deck would take the following form:
begin:control
nx = 128
npart = 20 * nx
t_end = 42.4e-15
x_min = 0
x_max = 4.0e-6
field_ionisation = T
end:control
begin:boundaries
bc_x_min = simple_laser
bc_x_max = open
end:boundaries
begin:laser
boundary = x_min
intensity = 3.0e15 * 1.0e4
lambda = 800.0e-9
t_profile = 1
t_end = 10.7e-15
end:laser
begin:species
name = Si
charge = 0
atomic_no = 14
mass = 1836.2 * 28.0
frac = 0.5
rho = if ((x lt 3.30e-6) and (x gt 3.05e-6), 2.7e28, 0)
ionise = T
electron_species = Electron
end:species
begin:species
name = O
charge = 0
atomic_no = 8
mass = 1836.2 * 16.0
frac = 0.5
rho = if ((x lt 3.30e-6) and (x gt 3.05e-6), 5.3e28, 0)
ionise = T
electron_species = Electron
end:species
begin:species
name = Electron
frac = 0
identify:electron
end:species
begin:output
dt_snapshot = t_end/100
number_density = always + species
end:output
Hope this helps, Stuart
Hello @Status-Mirror in this given input deck don't we have to specify the electron properties in another species block?
Hi @Hnair13,
We do specify the electron properties, here:
begin:species
name = Electron
frac = 0
identify:electron
end:species
In the input deck I provide, we start with neutral non-ionised silicon and oxygen - there are no free electrons in the system we need to load. As the target is ionised, the ionisation routines will start to populate our empty Electron
species with ejected macro-electrons.
Cheers, Stuart
Just to add, from a not particularly rigorous search, the disassociation energy of SiO2 is lower than the ionisation energies of their constituent parts (although possibly not dramatically so), so the approach @Status-Mirror suggests is reasonable.
Thank you for your answer. I think I have understanded it.
Dear all,
I want to simulate the field ionization of SiO2. Is it OK just to set the atom fraction to be 1:2 ? Is the energy gap,or say the ionisation and binding energies of such kind of compound included in EPOCH physics_packages/TABLES directory?
@Status-Mirror Thank you!