Closed f52985 closed 2 months ago
This is saying the same thing. The SpecTec is using a meta-variable that is the same on both sides, so the equality is implicit.
Oh I see. I think I was mislead by the rendered version.
I was looking at the rendered version of the spec,
and I missed that the null?
was actually supposed to be treated as a meta variable (mainly due to its color and font).
Ah, actually, that is a problem. With that rendering hack it does not make sense. I'll prepare a fix.
Hi,
This is just a simple question about the difference between the original and the spectec-written spec for the validation of
convert
.The original spec has a premise that checks if two
null?
s are equal:But the spectec-written spec does not have it:
Is this an intended modification of the spec?