Closed apepkuss closed 10 months ago
Hello, I am a code review bot on flows.network. Here are my reviews of code commits in this PR.
Overall Summary: The patch primarily consists of updating dependencies and making improvements to the workflow. However, there are a few potential issues and errors that need to be addressed.
Potential problems:
WASMEDGE_DIR
and WASMEDGE_BUILD_DIR
) may cause issues if they were being used in subsequent steps.--features static
and additional features) require documentation and explanations for their purpose and impact.Important Findings:
libboost-all-dev
dependency without clear justification could result in build failures if the code relies on it.--features static
flag should be verified to ensure correct implementation and testing.Overall, the patch needs better documentation and clarification to ensure that all changes are well-documented and justified. The potential issues and errors, such as removal of important dependencies and lack of explanations for certain changes, need to be addressed.
Key changes in the patch:
wasmedge/wasmedge:latest
to wasmedge/wasmedge:ubuntu-build-clang
.rustfmt
and clippy
steps.WASMEDGE_DIR
and WASMEDGE_BUILD_DIR
in the clippy
and first Test Rust SDK
steps.Test Rust SDK with async feature
step.Potential problems:
WASMEDGE_DIR
and WASMEDGE_BUILD_DIR
) could have been used in subsequent steps, and their removal may cause issues.Test Rust Bindings
step was renamed to Test Rust SDK
.Test Rust SDK
step may require additional explanations or justification.Overall, the patch seems to mostly update dependencies and improve the workflow. However, better documentation and clearer explanations of the changes would be beneficial.
Key changes:
Potential problems:
Additional notes:
Key changes:
--features static
flag to the test commands.Potential problems:
wasmedge-sdk
package. Make sure that this is intentional and that all necessary tests are being executed for the entire project.--features static
flag has been added to the test commands, but it is unclear what effects this flag has and whether it is necessary or desired for the project. Verify that the static
feature is correctly implemented and being tested as intended.Key changes:
aot
, wasmedge_process
, and ffi
for the first test, and async
for the second test.Potential problems:
aot
, wasmedge_process
, and ffi
were added for the first test, and async
for the second test. This should be documented or discussed in the pull request to provide context.Key changes:
Install dependencies
step, the line apt install -y software-properties-common libboost-all-dev llvm-15-dev liblld-15-dev ninja-build
has been modified.libboost-all-dev
has been removed from the installation command.Potential problems:
libboost-all-dev
dependency may cause the build to fail if the code relies on it.libboost-all-dev
dependency was removed. This change should be justified in the pull request description or comments.Overall, the key change is the removal of the libboost-all-dev
dependency, which may cause issues if the code relies on it. The reasoning behind this change should be clarified in the pull request.
@hydai Please help review this PR. Thanks a lot!
@hydai The review issue has been fixed. Please help review the updated. Thanks!
@hydai Thanks for the review!
In this PR, the
rust-static-lib
workflow is updated to match the latest codebase and fix #92.