Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Just checked in the database and the drop rate is 3% before server drops
increase
Original comment by L1Vala...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 12:14
so 6% for linret, thats too high imo for something you can sell to an npc
for 30k and farm like crazy
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 12:20
should be 1%
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 8:05
is it for all dual weapons or only 1 pacific?
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 8:06
is there more than one? I think this is for the ones that drop in the newb
ToS area
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 2:53
Dull weapon is not actually a weapon, just an item you can sell to some shops.
it should only drop from the newb ToS area. Maybe we should keep it as is for
the moment or drop the % to 1.5 so its 3% on linret, I think any lower it would
be too low. The area doesnt have many drops yet it is very intensive on healing
pot usage. Im pretty sure this is the reason that you can sell the item for so
much.
Original comment by L1Vala...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 3:05
ya I'm fine with the price, just not the drop rate. As is, if it were added
to shops like it should be, I think it'd be a get rich quick area lol
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 3:08
Will someone verify this would be correct? Also double check my drop chance
rate, I always forget how those are divided in to percents. I was aiming for
1.5%
INSERT INTO shop VALUES(70023, 'Aden Chamber of Commerce', 41206, 'Dull
Weapon', 0, -1, 0, 30000);
INSERT INTO shop VALUES(70037, 'Aden Chamber of Commerce', 41206, 'Dull
Weapon', 0, -1, 0, 30000);
INSERT INTO shop VALUES(70064, 'Aden Chamber of Commerce', 41206, 'Dull
Weapon', 0, -1, 0, 30000);
INSERT INTO shop VALUES(70076, 'Aden Chamber of Commerce', 41206, 'Dull
Weapon', 0, -1, 0, 30000);
--
UPDATE droplist SET chance = 15000 WHERE itemId = 41206;
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 3:19
yea thats correct
Original comment by L1Vala...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 3:24
Thanks for verifying. Fixed in r490
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 3:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tric...@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2011 at 12:04