Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
at a glance I can see some missedattackpackets in our old L1Attack that the new
one doesn't seem to have, but so much has changed I'm not sure where to stick
them until I can do a lot of local testing
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 4:18
missing should be on the damage formula but ower formula is a little odd.
because we never missed almost if you check the dummy and hit it it hits it
allot but only get a few exp if you check it on retail it go fast with the
dummy to receive exp. i think this is a problem with the dmg calculation. if
you check 99nets l1j or l1jp2 they have a little different dmg formula.
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 5:00
they use long and short distance may theres a fix for you init.
http://l1j-tw-99nets.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/l1j/server/server/model/L1Atta
ck.java
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 5:12
hmmz i whas thinking maybe we are missing a calculation??? for that
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 5:14
with extremely careful merging/checking, I wouldn't be opposed to trying
l1j-jp2's l1attack. Not until someone is capable of thoroughly testing it
though
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 5:34
I thought it was something smelf/ssargon or someone did custom for us a long
time ago, that l1j-jp never had. I cant swear to that though.
if l1j-jp has anything for it, I didn't notice it at a glance. It should be
in L1Attack
Original comment by tric...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 5:39
i think i fixed this 1 week ago.
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2011 at 3:22
this tickets can be closed they are fixed and merged in into the github.
Original comment by Nuijen...@gmail.com
on 25 Jul 2011 at 5:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tric...@gmail.com
on 28 Jun 2011 at 2:20