Having 'SPP' as an available option for client_factory(...) suggests to users that we have a client implemented for Southwest Power Pool when we actually don't. I would be pretty frustrated if I saw SPP listed, only to be met with a completely non-functional client.
This commit removes that confusion until we're able to implement #141 properly. It also deletes spp_test.py which had a bunch of useless content that was commented out entirely.
Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 31.997% when pulling 2ec01b0d2a50ab377a54d302a53e91d6aa7ef279 on r24mille:141_remove_spp_until_implemented into d4cb57578728cef10074e58383b30fcf9da63ea2 on WattTime:master.
Having 'SPP' as an available option for
client_factory(...)
suggests to users that we have a client implemented for Southwest Power Pool when we actually don't. I would be pretty frustrated if I saw SPP listed, only to be met with a completely non-functional client.This commit removes that confusion until we're able to implement #141 properly. It also deletes
spp_test.py
which had a bunch of useless content that was commented out entirely.