Add pressure for social features e.g., a twitter share mechanism

[markwhiting]

1. There should be a share button.
2. It should provide a WORDLE style snippet that can be copied and pasted into other platforms, e.g., twitter or Facebook, that playfully and visually shows your commonsensicality or distribution and has a link for people to click to measure theirs too
3. Ideally it would identify the user e.g., commonsense.seas.upenn.edu/23lekjsdf (which will mean that a particular user is thought of as connected to another user)

[amirrr]

Example of a sharable tweet text courtesy of chatgpt:

🧠 Common Sense Score: 78% Just completed the Common Sense Test with a score of 78%. Assess your practical reasoning and knowledge. Give it a try! 🔗 Test: [Unique Link]

CommonSenseTest #PracticalReasoning

[amirrr]

🎉 Common Sense Champion! 🧠✨ I just aced the Common Sense Test with a solid score of 78% 🙌🔥 Can you beat that? Put your knowledge to the test and see how well you fare! 😄💡 🔗 Compare your score with mine: [Unique Link]

CommonSenseMastery #BrainTeasers #ChallengeYourself

[markwhiting]

I really like the Wordle tweet model:

Wordle 710 4/6

⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛🟨 ⬛🟨🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Not bad lol 🍀

It's simple, it shows the result clearly, and it can be extended with personal comments. But, it's missing a link.

I wonder about something like:

I have more common sense than 60% of people! |||||🫢----💯 What about you? → www.internet.com

[markwhiting]

Another idea:

I have more common sense than 65% of people! ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛😀🔲🔲🔲 🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲 🔲🔲🤖🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲 🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲💯 ...but not quite as much as ChatGPT 🦾

[markwhiting]

Something like a social signal of the person whose link you clicked on?

⬛⬛⬛🫥⬛⬛😀🔲🔲💯 URL?

Just noting that Wordle tweets don't have URLs:

Wordle 712 6/6

⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

[markwhiting]

A simple alternative?

I have more commonsense than 67% of the population! 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩💯 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜😀

Check yours: commonsensicality.org/asldkj

[markwhiting]

After chatting with @duncanjwatts:

My common sense is 56% 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨😀⬜⬜⬜⬜ Check yours: commonsensicality.org/asldkj

[markwhiting]

Possible emoji levels: (can be more granular so that each value has a few possible faces, but this is just a rough suggestion, feel free to adjust)

very low: 🤥😶😵‍💫😵🥴 kind of low: 😏🫤😕 middle: 🤨🙂😌😋😀 kind of high: 😃😄😁🥸😎 very high: 😆🥳🧐🤓🤯🤩

[markwhiting]

const pick = (arr) => arr[Math.floor(Math.random() * arr.length)]

const chosen_emoji = pick(
  [
    [..."🤯"],
    [..."🤥😶😵‍💫"],
    [..."😵🥴"],
    [..."😏🫤😕"],
    [..."🤨🙂😌"],
    [..."😋😀"],
    [..."😃😄😁"],
    [..."🥸😎"],
    [..."😆🥳🧐"],
    [..."🤓🤩"]
  ][score]
)