[Add] Subjective Value Inventory

[JamesPHoughton]

Add a new survey to the repository according to the instructions in the package README.md.

Survey Title

Survey Source

• http://www.subjectivevalue.com/
• Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006). What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493-512.
• http://www.subjectivevalue.com/images/SVI_Information_and_Items.pdf

Survey Overview

a framework for understanding the range of social psychological outcomes valued subjectively as consequences of negotiations

Aggregation/scoring function

Items 3 and 5 should be reverse-scored (i.e., a response of 7 becomes 1, a response of 6 becomes 2, and so forth). Next, items within each of the four sub-scales should be averaged (with equal weightings) to yield four sub-scale scores (i.e., Instrumental, Self, Process, and Relationship). If desired, a Global score can be calculated by averaging (with equal weightings) these four sub-scale scores. A Rapport score may also be calculated by averaging scores for Process and Relationship (with equal weightings).

Tasks

• [ ] Create a new folder in surveys w/ descriptive, easy-to-read name superSpecialSurvey/
• [ ] Create SurveyJS .json file (e.g. superSpecialSurvey/superSpecialSurvey.json)
  • [ ] Change the default completion page to a blank page ("showCompletedPage": false)
• [ ] Create a .bib file citing your references for the survey (always: superSpecialSurvey/references.bib)
• [ ] Create file with function to aggregate survey data (e.g. superSpecialSurvey.score.js)
• [ ] Create a cypress test of the survey (e.g. superSpecialSurvey.cy.jsx)
  • [ ] Include a line to take a screenshot at the end of every page
• [ ] Create a readme markdown file to document (always: superSpecialSurvey/README.md)
  • [ ] Include relevant screenshots
• [ ] Update the package minor version
• [ ] Rebuild the package using npm run build to update SHAs
• [ ] Create PR and link to this issue

[JamesPHoughton]

close in favor of: https://github.com/Watts-Lab/surveys/issues/148