Open JamesPHoughton opened 2 years ago
Just wondering — is there a reasons you would use zenodo over OSF for this?
As an aside, do you think people will cite this vs the specific surveys? In the event that we create a new survey, presumably it would have its own paper, validation, and DOI etc too?
Ah, this might also be interesting → About citation files
do you think people will cite this vs the specific surveys? In the event that we create a new survey, presumably it would have its own paper, validation, and DOI etc too?
I would certainly expect that a new validated survey would have its own publication that people could cite when using it. I would probably want that publication to be able to cite this repository as the location for an implementation-of-record of the survey, and that other people might cite this repo if they end up using a number of other surveys we have implemented, or if they use our implementation of someone else's survey.
As for zenodo vs OSF, I hadn't really given it much thought. Zenodo is well integrated with github, I haven't used OSF as much. Adding a task to this issue for whoever does it to spend 15 minutes looking at the differences.
OK! I have no opinion about the OSF thing, just wondering.
As a researcher (possibly from another lab or institution) I want to be able to cite this repository as a resource used in my own research, so that I have clean documentation in my publications, and to express credit appropriately.
One way to do this is with Zenodo:
Documentation here: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/archiving-a-github-repository/referencing-and-citing-content Example of DOI badge in readme here: https://github.com/JamesPHoughton/pysd, and zenodo link here: https://zenodo.org/record/6381722#.YksL4W7MJhE
We could also do it with OSF
Ready to merge when