Open MrZorG33 opened 8 months ago
I think in this case it is ok not to have the option - you already have the building. Ok, would be nice in this case the third option would not be shown...but I assume that would require a further Python function/code. Hence, I think we can live with that?
yes we can live with it, it's not something that needs an instant fix. but it's better to fix it.
What's wrong with allowing players to view other potential options?
@Razonatair There is nothing wrong. but this confuses the player. as an option, show a hint why this choice cannot be made.
in my test game the EVENTTRIGGER_BURNING_CORN_CHAMBER trigger worked. however, despite the presence of gold in the treasury, I cannot make the choice of the third option (subtract 1500 gold from the treasury and get Granary).
and this happened due to the fact that the building proposed for construction (Granary) had already been built.
Is it possible to add to the trigger a check for the presence of the building proposed in the third option?