Closed alexcrichton closed 1 year ago
Oops, yes, thanks, that's missing from the validation rules.
I realized writing #190 that an above bullet (rewritten by #190) covers all the annotated name cases, thereby implying the above.
I think this is resolved, so closing, but feel free to reopen if not.
Currently I think this is a valid component:
since there's no validation about
[static]...
annotated-functions other than "it's a function". There could be no resources nameda
, though, in the component or there could be multiple (e.g. named through different paths through instances).