Open eqrion opened 1 month ago
We have more or less the same desktop distribution. On mobile situation is better: 29% is iOS users(iphone/ipad has fp16 starting from iphone 8, so 95.3% of iOS devices have it now) For Android it is harder to make an estimation. 69% of mobile users use Android base phones. 39% of them considered low-tier and 30% mid-tier. I would assume about half of Android users have fp16 extension and therefore more than half of mobile users have it.
I'm trying to quantify what percentage of Firefox users could actually use this proposal.
Using [1] and [2], here's what I got. Note: this is desktop only data.
For desktop we have ~97% x86/x86_64 usage between Intel/AMD. The remaining ~3% looks like apple silicon if I'm reading right for our only major AArch64 usage.
ARMv8-A NEON fp16 3% implied from Apple Silicon
F16C: No direct data. For Intel it was added in Ivy Bridge. The successor, Haswell, introduced AVX2. We have 82% support for AVX and 72% for AVX2, so I would guess F16C is somewhere between there?
AVX-512 fp16: Only in Xeon, so I'm assuming no usage.
@SPY (or anyone else) do you have any more accurate usage numbers here?
I'm going to see if I can find any mobile usage numbers, but that will take a longer time as our pre-generated dashboards don't see to track this.
[1] https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/hardware [2] https://firefoxgraphics.github.io/telemetry/#view=system