Closed fitzgen closed 5 years ago
Right now we have two subsections:
bind
It seems like it might make sense to split (2) into two subsections: one for the function bindings definitions and another for the bind pairings.
Agreed. Happy to have a PR; otherwise I'll get around to it before too long.
Closing as out-of-date: the proposal has evolved and no longer has Web IDL types or function bindings.
Right now we have two subsections:
bind
s that pair a bindings definition with an actual wasm functionIt seems like it might make sense to split (2) into two subsections: one for the function bindings definitions and another for the
bind
pairings.