Open dannywillems opened 1 year ago
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to fix the typedef for byte_t
instead?
I thought about it. byte_t
is used in different places, and I didn't know if it would impact a lot of the codebase/users.
If you confirm it is fine, I agree with changing.
@rossberg thoughts on this 👆?
Yes, confirmed. Thanks. :)
@dannywillems should we update then the byte_t
typedef so this PR can be merged?
Related to https://github.com/wasmerio/wasmer/pull/3597/