This is the same as closed (but not merged) PR #738.
We are fixing a problem that happens when escrowing replay messages that authorize the EndRole of a multisig, where the EndRole got accepted but the same replay message keeps being escrowed and rejected because the date timestamp is not increasing. Since the authorization event is the same, we are validating that the compared messages are idempotent.
This is the same as closed (but not merged) PR #738. We are fixing a problem that happens when escrowing replay messages that authorize the EndRole of a multisig, where the EndRole got accepted but the same replay message keeps being escrowed and rejected because the date timestamp is not increasing. Since the authorization event is the same, we are validating that the compared messages are idempotent.