Closed enkiusz closed 4 years ago
Are you still working on this @mgrela?
Hi, sorry for the delay, stuff happened outside of GH. I posted the third round of changes with the suggestions implemented.
I'm glad to see that you are still working on it :)
@madb1lly Thanks for looking looking up the original source, the comment on ppm seems good enough to me! I guess Wikipedia is wrong.
Regarding μg/m3, for all the other units we use we write the long form rather than the abbreviated form so whatever we use it should really be consistent. What would be the valid long form of this unit? Also, m3 is presumably not the same thing as m³?
@mrstegeman Did you mean to post that link in #67?
Hi @benfrancis,
I think long form would be micrograms per cubic metre.
I don't think m3 works as a unit because it would mean 3m. But will the schema accept the Unicode superscript 3 character? Does it need the short version at all?
Cheers 🙂
@benfrancis Yes... 😶
@madb1lly wrote:
I think long form would be micrograms per cubic metre.
Yep that looks right. Like "joule per cubic metre" for energy density.
So as long-winded as it is, "micrograms per cubic metre" seems like the consistent choice, and avoids the need for a superscript 3 :)
I created a pull request #68
We handle conversions to the short form at the gateway level anyway, so a normal user should never see the long form.
You might be interested to know that the W3C WoT Working Group are discussing using SenML for the WoT "core profile", which seems more constrained than allowing any valid SI unit https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/issues/29
Fixes #28 Fixes #38