Open marclaporte opened 1 month ago
Mm that sucks @marclaporte. Thanks for bringing that my attention. Weird that there is no rationale to be found about the move.
This package builds quite heavily on top of that package. So I don't think this repo will / should diverge onto something else.
I guess we can just keep this package around for now. And keep depending on the abandon ware. Although maybe we should make note of that on the repo page?
Weird that there is no rationale to be found about the move.
@weierophinney is the Matthew referenced here: "Matthew indicated that he feels without anybody who can commit to maintaining it, and nobody on the team with security experience in this particular area, it may actually be a disservice to end users to commit to security patches." Source: https://github.com/laminas/technical-steering-committee/blob/main/meetings/minutes/2023-12-04-TSC-Minutes.md
For analysis:
Other users of laminas-mail: https://packagist.org/packages/laminas/laminas-mail/dependents?order_by=downloads
Other users of slm/mail: https://packagist.org/packages/slm/mail/dependents?order_by=downloads
Also, the Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware project uses: https://gitlab.com/tikiwiki/tiki/-/blob/24.x/vendor_bundled/composer.json#L139 https://doc.tiki.org/Transactional-Email-Providers
https://github.com/laminas/laminas-mail/blob/2.26.x/README.md https://github.com/laminas/technical-steering-committee/blob/main/meetings/minutes/2023-12-04-TSC-Minutes.md