meeting 04.27

[lindseysschwartz]

• talk through 2nd IRR test - mostly in agreement over inclusion (clarifying Q about naming specific), disagreement over methods
  • exclude micromobility
  • Include No. 29 (https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000576834400002) when tncs are active in a location it affect choices about ridership / mobility
• solidify screening protocol and criteria
• next week: discuss variables to extract

[lindseysschwartz]

For next week:

• @samMint + @lindseysschwartz will run each query in W0S and take a sample of <25 papers following the protocol nic laid out (https://github.com/PugetSoundClinic-PIT/Fare-Fair/blob/main/protocol-process.md) -- determine if using the tool worth the overhead or if we should just use Google sheets
  • LS will test DNC; SM will test TNC
• Once we confirm tool vs spreadsheet, we will run queries against the 3 databases - W0S, IEEE, ACM - and test out PubMed. For each search, record:
  1. the query used (TNC or DNC)
  2. the database searched
  3. the initial number of results
  4. and the number of papers left after we remove duplicates
• Before we screen, we will divvy up the sample
• We'll discuss variables to extract in our next meeting - to prepare, we'll each review our RQs to make sure that we're extracting the info we'll need

[lindseysschwartz]

• SM and LS talk about ASR review and workflow - maybe discuss examples of 'UX-ish' studies if time
• Discuss variables to extract