I found 2 manuscript quarto files, I wasn't sure which one was the right one. Unfortunately neither of them rendered. It produces an error complaining about html functions. Please address that so the final version can be rendered into a word document.
All figures/tables/etc. for the main text should be publication quality. Right now they look more like EDA. For supplement, a little bit less polish is ok. Even less for any figures/tables that are part of the other R/qmd files.
I suggest you don't hard-code results into the manuscript file. E.g., this text "RMSE = 58.4, 5.50" should probably be replaced by some inline R code like RMSE = r res1_RMSE where the variable res1_RMSE contains the number. You just need to make sure you load the data that contains it. The advantage of doing it this way is that if anything in our data or model changes that changes the value, it will automatically be updated.
The analysis section still needs work, but overall I think it's on the right track.
I found 2 manuscript quarto files, I wasn't sure which one was the right one. Unfortunately neither of them rendered. It produces an error complaining about html functions. Please address that so the final version can be rendered into a word document.
All figures/tables/etc. for the main text should be publication quality. Right now they look more like EDA. For supplement, a little bit less polish is ok. Even less for any figures/tables that are part of the other R/qmd files.
I suggest you don't hard-code results into the manuscript file. E.g., this text "RMSE = 58.4, 5.50" should probably be replaced by some inline R code like RMSE =
r res1_RMSEwhere the variableres1_RMSEcontains the number. You just need to make sure you load the data that contains it. The advantage of doing it this way is that if anything in our data or model changes that changes the value, it will automatically be updated.The analysis section still needs work, but overall I think it's on the right track.